Literature DB >> 19499260

Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a major factor for predicting the effects of organic wastes on soil bacterial communities assessed by DNA-based molecular techniques.

Yuan Ge1, Chengrong Chen, Zhihong Xu, Simon M Eldridge, Kwong Yin Chan, Yan He, Ji-Zheng He.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Current Australian legislation permits the beneficial application of grease trap waste (GTW) to agricultural soil, viewing it as a beneficial source of organic matter and soil conditioner containing no/low amounts of metals or pathogenic organisms. However, little is known about the influence of GTW on soil bacterial community. A field experiment was established at Menangle in south western Sydney in Australia to quantitatively assess the impacts of different types (GTW CO and GTW CL) and amounts of GTW application on the soil bacterial community and diversity. Furthermore, a municipal solid waste (MSW) compost was simultaneously examined to compare against the other organic wastes. Knowledge about the shifts in microbial community structure and diversity following the applications of organic wastes could help to evaluate the ecological consequences on the soil and thus to develop sound regulatory guidelines for the beneficial reuse of organic wastes in agricultural lands.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Soil samples were collected from recycled organics plots treated with different types and quantity of organic wastes. The field experimental treatments included control (CK, without application of any organic wastes), low amount of GTW CO (COL), GTW CL (CLL), and MSW (ML), and high amounts of GTW CO (COH), GTW CL (CLH), and MSW compost (MH). Microbial DNA was extracted from soil samples and the 16S rRNA genes were polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified. The PCR products were analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), cloning, and sequencing. The bacterial community structures and diversity were assessed using the DGGE profiles and clone libraries constructed from the excised DGGE bands.
RESULTS: DGGE-based analyses showed that application of the GTW CO, regardless of the amount applied, had significant negative effects on soil bacterial genotypic diversity and community structure compared with the control, while the applications of other organic wastes including the GTW CL and MSW had no clear effects. The effects of the rate of organic waste application on soil bacterial community characteristics varied with the types of organic wastes applied. Sequence-based analyses of 126 clones indicated that Proteobacteria (53.2%) was the dominant taxa at the experimental site, followed by Actinobacteria (9.5%), Bacteroidetes (7.9%), Firmicutes (7.9%), Gemmatimonadetes (5.6%), Chloroflexi (2.4%), Acidobacteria (1.6%) and the unclassified group (11.9%). In the COH treatment, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Gemmatimonadetes were not detected; the percentages of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria in the COH treatment were significantly different from those in CK. There is a significant positive correlation (r = 0.71, p = 0.002) between the C/N ratio of organic wastes and the bacterial genotypic communities. DISCUSSION: Both the type and the amount of GTW applied affected soil bacterial genotypic diversity and community structure. The different effects of various types of organic wastes on soil bacterial characteristics may be predicted by the differences in specific properties of organic wastes such as C/N ratio, as evidenced by the strong and significant positive relationship between the bacterial community distance and the environmental distance of C/N ratio. This also indicates that the C/N ratio of GTW applied can be a major driver for the shift in the soil bacterial community.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that the effects of organic wastes on soil bacterial communities varied with the types of organic wastes, and depending on the rate of application. Application of the GTW CO led to significant shifts in soil bacterial community diversity and structure. The effects of different types of organic wastes on the soil bacterial characteristics can be predicted by the differences of specific properties of organic wastes, such as the C/N ratio. Sequence-based analyses of 126 clones indicated that Proteobacteria was the dominant taxa at the experimental site. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Our results have important implications for developing sound regulatory guidelines for the beneficial reuse of organic wastes, indicating that GTW CO and similar organic waste treatments may not be suitable for application in agricultural soils due to its significant negative effect on soil bacterial community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19499260     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0185-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  23 in total

1.  Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils.

Authors:  Martina S Girvan; Juliet Bullimore; Jules N Pretty; A Mark Osborn; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services.

Authors:  Thomas Bell; Jonathan A Newman; Bernard W Silverman; Sarah L Turner; Andrew K Lilley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Larger islands house more bacterial taxa.

Authors:  Thomas Bell; Duane Ager; Ji-Inn Song; Jonathan A Newman; Ian P Thompson; Andrew K Lilley; Christopher J van der Gast
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The metagenomics of soil.

Authors:  Rolf Daniel
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 5.  Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Differences in soil bacterial diversity: driven by contemporary disturbances or historical contingencies?

Authors:  Yuan Ge; Ji-zheng He; Yong-guan Zhu; Jia-bao Zhang; Zhihong Xu; Li-mei Zhang; Yuan-ming Zheng
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Effect of metal-rich sludge amendments on the soil microbial community.

Authors:  E Bååth; M Díaz-Raviña; S Frostegård; C D Campbell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Novel techniques for analysing microbial diversity in natural and perturbed environments.

Authors:  V Torsvik; F L Daae; R A Sandaa; L Ovreås
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1998-09-17       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Comparison of phenotypic diversity and DNA heterogeneity in a population of soil bacteria.

Authors:  V Torsvik; K Salte; R Sørheim; J Goksøyr
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods.

Authors:  E Smit; P Leeflang; S Gommans; J van den Broek; S van Mil; K Wernars
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  8 in total

1.  Fruitbody chemistry underlies the structure of endofungal bacterial communities across fungal guilds and phylogenetic groups.

Authors:  Mari Pent; Mohammad Bahram; Kadri Põldmaa
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Composition analysis and application of degradation products of whole feathers through a large scale of fermentation.

Authors:  Zhang-Jun Cao; Dan Lu; Lai-Sheng Luo; Yun-Xia Deng; Yong-Gang Bian; Xing-Qun Zhang; Mei-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The spatial factor, rather than elevated CO₂, controls the soil bacterial community in a temperate Forest Ecosystem.

Authors:  Yuan Ge; Chengrong Chen; Zhihong Xu; Ram Oren; Ji-Zheng He
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Combined analyses of bacterial, fungal and nematode communities in andosolic agricultural soils in Japan.

Authors:  Zhihua Bao; Yoko Ikunaga; Yuko Matsushita; Sho Morimoto; Yuko Takada-Hoshino; Hiroaki Okada; Hirosuke Oba; Shuhei Takemoto; Shigeru Niwa; Kentaro Ohigashi; Chika Suzuki; Kazunari Nagaoka; Makoto Takenaka; Yasufumi Urashima; Hiroyuki Sekiguchi; Atsuhiko Kushida; Koki Toyota; Masanori Saito; Seiya Tsushima
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Diversity and bioactive potentials of culturable heterotrophic bacteria from the surficial sediments of the Arabian Sea.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Anas; Charulatha Nilayangod; C Jasmin; Saradavey Vinothkumar; P S Parameswaran; Shanta Nair
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Does thinning-induced gap size result in altered soil microbial community in pine plantation in eastern Tibetan Plateau?

Authors:  Bing Yang; Xueyong Pang; Bin Hu; Weikai Bao; Guanglong Tian
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Assessing the microbial community and functional genes in a vertical soil profile with long-term arsenic contamination.

Authors:  Jinbo Xiong; Zhili He; Joy D Van Nostrand; Guosheng Luo; Shuxin Tu; Jizhong Zhou; Gejiao Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deforestation impacts network co-occurrence patterns of microbial communities in Amazon soils.

Authors:  M A Wadud Khan; Brendan J M Bohannan; Klaus Nüsslein; James M Tiedje; Susannah G Tringe; Eloi Parlade; Albert Barberán; Jorge L M Rodrigues
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.194

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.