| Literature DB >> 22223474 |
Zhihua Bao1, Yoko Ikunaga, Yuko Matsushita, Sho Morimoto, Yuko Takada-Hoshino, Hiroaki Okada, Hirosuke Oba, Shuhei Takemoto, Shigeru Niwa, Kentaro Ohigashi, Chika Suzuki, Kazunari Nagaoka, Makoto Takenaka, Yasufumi Urashima, Hiroyuki Sekiguchi, Atsuhiko Kushida, Koki Toyota, Masanori Saito, Seiya Tsushima.
Abstract
We simultaneously examined the bacteria, fungi and nematode communities in Andosols from four agro-geographical sites in Japan using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22223474 PMCID: PMC4036027 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me11281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Fig. 1Sampling sites for soil bacterial, fungal and nematode communities in Japan.
Environmental data obtained from four Andosol sampling sites
| Sample name | Sampling location (Prefecture) | Latitude/longitude | Sampling dates | TC (%) | TN (%) | C/N ratio | pH (H2O) | AP | ST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM | Memuro (Hokkaido) | N42°53′21″/E143°4′32″ | 2007.7.18 | 4.7 (±0.3) | 0.25 (±0.08) | 20.5 (±0.5) | 5.8 (±0.1) | 50.3 (±10.7) | 8.5 |
| FS | Fukushima (Fukushima) | N37°42′37″/E140°23′29″ | 2007.8.28 | 1.6 (±0.3) | 0.18 (±0.02) | 9.1 (±0.5) | 5.7 (±0.2) | 127.3 (±131.1) | 13.8 |
| HT | Hiratsuka (Kanagawa) | N35°21′04″/E139°16′53″ | 2007.9.2 | 3.4 (±0.3) | 0.34 (±0.05) | 10.0 (±1.0) | 5.9 (±0.2) | 191.5 (±37.6) | 16.7 |
| TK | Tsukuba (Ibaraki) | N36°01′40″/E140°06′01″ | 2007.5.14 | 4.1 (±0.8) | 0.34 (±0.05) | 12.0 (±1.0) | 6.1 (±0.3) | 350.0 (±160.5) | 15.5 |
TC, total carbon; TN, total nitrogen; AP, available P; ST, soil temperature.
Standard error of the mean (SEM) is shown in parentheses.
Fig. 2Principal component analysis (PCA) based on PCR-DGGE profiles of the bacterial (A), fungal (B) and nematode (C) communities. □, samples of MM site; ●, samples of FS site; ▲, samples of HT site; ⋄, samples of TK site.
Fig. 3Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination diagram of bacterial (A), fungal (B) and nematode (C) PCR-DGGE profiles, with environmental variables such as TC, TN, C/N ratio, pH, AP and ST. □, samples of MM site; ●, samples of FS site; ▲, samples of HT site; ⋄, samples of TK site.
Percentage of DGGE bands significantly correlated with environmental variables in overall DGGE bands of bacterial, fungal and nematode communities by multiple regression (P<0.05)
| Number of DGGE bands appeared in all samples | Percentage (%) of DGGE bands correlated to environmental variables (No. of DGGE bands) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| TC | TN | pH | C/N ratio | ST | AP | ||
| Bacteria | 59 | 29 (17) | 31 (18) | 7 (4) | 39 (23) | 17 (10) | 10 (6) |
| Fungi | 48 | 25 (12) | 25 (12) | 6 (3) | 25 (12) | 33 (16) | 15 (7) |
| Nematode | 55 | 15 (8) | 13 (7) | 7 (4) | 18 (10) | 16 (9) | 18 (10) |
Fig. 4Two-way cluster analysis of combined DGGE profiles of bacterial, fungal and nematode communities. The results of cluster analysis of DGGE bands (left side) and PCR-DGGE profiles combining bacterial, fungal and nematode communities (lower side) are shown in (A). Black and white boxes in (A) indicate the presence and absence of DGGE bands in each sample, respectively. For each cluster obtained from cluster analysis of DGGE bands (left side shown in (A)), the percentages of the DGGE bands with high detection frequency, which were detected in more than 3 out of 8 soil samples, in each site (□, MM; ●, FS; ▲, HT; ⋄, TK) are shown in (B).