Literature DB >> 11319113

Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods.

E Smit1, P Leeflang, S Gommans, J van den Broek, S van Mil, K Wernars.   

Abstract

There is a paucity of knowledge on microbial community diversity and naturally occurring seasonal variations in agricultural soil. For this purpose the soil microbial community of a wheat field on an experimental farm in The Netherlands was studied by using both cultivation-based and molecule-based methods. Samples were taken in the different seasons over a 1-year period. Fatty acid-based typing of bacterial isolates obtained via plating revealed a diverse community of mainly gram-positive bacteria, and only a few isolates appeared to belong to the Proteobacteria and green sulfur bacteria. Some genera, such as Micrococcus, Arthrobacter, and Corynebacterium were detected throughout the year, while Bacillus was found only in July. Isolate diversity was lowest in July, and the most abundant species, Arthrobacter oxydans, and members of the genus Pseudomonas were found in reduced numbers in July. Analysis by molecular techniques showed that diversity of cloned 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences was greater than the diversity among cultured isolates. Moreover, based on analysis of 16S rDNA sequences, there was a more even distribution among five main divisions, Acidobacterium, Proteobacteria, Nitrospira, cyanobacteria, and green sulfur bacteria. No clones were found belonging to the gram-positive bacteria, which dominated the cultured isolates. Seasonal fluctuations were assessed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Statistical analysis of the banding patterns revealed significant differences between samples taken in different seasons. Cluster analysis of the patterns revealed that the bacterial community in July clearly differed from those in the other months. Although the molecule- and cultivation-based methods allowed the detection of different parts of the bacterial community, results from both methods indicated that the community present in July showed the largest difference from the communities of the other months. Efforts were made to use the sequence data for providing insight into more general ecological relationships. Based on the distribution of 16S rDNA sequences among the bacterial divisions found in this work and in literature, it is suggested that the ratio between the number of Proteobacteria and Acidobacterium organisms might be indicative of the trophic level of the soil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11319113      PMCID: PMC92868          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2284-2291.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  21 in total

1.  Levels of bacterial community diversity in four arid soils compared by cultivation and 16S rRNA gene cloning.

Authors:  J Dunbar; S Takala; S M Barns; J A Davis; C R Kuske
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Fully automatic determination of soil bacterium numbers, cell volumes, and frequencies of dividing cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis.

Authors:  J Bloem; M Veninga; J Shepherd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots.

Authors:  F A De Leij; J M Whipps; J M Lynch
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 4.  Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity.

Authors:  P Hugenholtz; B M Goebel; N R Pace
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Determinants of Soil Microbial Communities: Effects of Agricultural Management, Season, and Soil Type on Phospholipid Fatty Acid Profiles

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Phylogeny of the main bacterial 16S rRNA sequences in Drentse A grassland soils (The Netherlands).

Authors:  A Felske; A Wolterink; R Van Lis; A D Akkermans
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology.

Authors:  G Muyzer; K Smalla
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.271

8.  Reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA from Faenia rectivirgula, Pseudonocardia thermophila and Saccharopolyspora hirsuta, three wall type IV actinomycetes which lack mycolic acids.

Authors:  T M Embley; J Smida; E Stackebrandt
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1988-04

9.  Molecular microbial diversity of an agricultural soil in Wisconsin.

Authors:  J Borneman; P W Skroch; K M O'Sullivan; J A Palus; N G Rumjanek; J L Jansen; J Nienhuis; E W Triplett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  U Nübel; B Engelen; A Felske; J Snaidr; A Wieshuber; R I Amann; W Ludwig; H Backhaus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  114 in total

1.  Molecular and culture-based analyses of prokaryotic communities from an agricultural soil and the burrows and casts of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus.

Authors:  Michelle A Furlong; David R Singleton; David C Coleman; William B Whitman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches for determining bacterial diversity in heavy-metal-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Richard J Ellis; Philip Morgan; Andrew J Weightman; John C Fry
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Phylogenetic and physiological diversity of microorganisms isolated from a deep greenland glacier ice core.

Authors:  V I Miteva; P P Sheridan; J E Brenchley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bacterial population changes in a membrane bioreactor for graywater treatment monitored by denaturing gradient gel electrophoretic analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments.

Authors:  David M Stamper; Marianne Walch; Rachel N Jacobs
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil.

Authors:  Christopher Rösch; Alexander Mergel; Hermann Bothe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Responses of active bacterial and fungal communities in soils under winter wheat to different fertilizer and pesticide regimens.

Authors:  Martina S Girvan; Juliet Bullimore; Andrew S Ball; Jules N Pretty; A Mark Osborn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Bacterial community structure and diversity in a century-old manure-treated agroecosystem.

Authors:  H Y Sun; S P Deng; W R Raun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks.

Authors:  Laurent Philippot; Siv G E Andersson; Tom J Battin; James I Prosser; Joshua P Schimel; William B Whitman; Sara Hallin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  Microorganisms associated with feathers of barn swallows in radioactively contaminated areas around chernobyl.

Authors:  Gábor Arpád Czirják; Anders Pape Møller; Timothy A Mousseau; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Characterization of humus microbial communities in adjacent forest types that differ in nitrogen availability.

Authors:  S E Leckie; C E Prescott; S J Grayston; J D Neufeld; W W Mohn
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.