Literature DB >> 25971236

Early and late outcomes of AVR with aortic annular enlargement in octogenarian.

Yuki Okamoto1, Kazuo Yamamoto, Tsutomu Sugimoto, Shinpei Yoshii.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is no clear consensus on the procedures for octogenarians with a small aortic annulus who require aortic valve replacement (AVR). We evaluated surgical results in octogenarians who underwent AVR with aortic annular enlargement, Nicks procedure, for aortic stenosis with a small aortic annulus.
METHODS: Between January 2001 and March 2014, 131 octogenarian patients were treated at our institution. Nineteen patients received AVR with aortic annular enlargement (AAE group), and the others received standard AVR without annular enlargement (sAVR group). We compared early and late outcomes between the two groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in early complications between the groups. The rates for use of a mechanical valve (32 vs 22 %, p = 0.590), in-hospital mortality (5.3 vs 5.4 %, p = 1.000), and severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (0 vs 6.3 %, p = 0.593) were also similar between the AAE and sAVR group. In the AAE group, there was no cardiac-related death, bleeding event, thromboembolism, or stroke during the follow-up period (mean 37.6 months). The rates of freedom from cardiac events at 8 years were 94 % in the AAE group and 57 % in the sAVR group (p = 0.292). The overall survival rates at 8 years were 77 % in the AAE group and 77 % in sAVR group (p = 0.462). There were no significant differences in these rates between the groups.
CONCLUSION: AVR with aortic annular enlargement in octogenarians with small aortic annulus was safe and led to good operative and long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25971236     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-015-0559-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  26 in total

1.  Long-term results after aortic root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with small aortic annulus.

Authors:  Paul P Urbanski; Witold Dinstak; Wilko Rents; Nicolas Heinz; Anno Diegeler
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-30

2.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Hasan Jilaihawi; Samir Kapadia; Augusto D Pichard; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; John G Webb; Howard C Herrmann; Joseph E Bavaria; Susheel Kodali; David L Brown; Bruce Bowers; Todd M Dewey; Lars G Svensson; Murat Tuzcu; Jeffrey W Moses; Matthew R Williams; Robert J Siegel; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Stuart Pocock; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement varies according to age at operation.

Authors:  Joel Price; Hadi Toeg; Buu-Khanh Lam; Harry Lapierre; Thierry G Mesana; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The stentless freestyle bioprosthesis: impact of age over 80 years on quality of life, perioperative, and mid-term outcome.

Authors:  Jürgen Ennker; Fatmir Dalladaku; Ulrich Rosendahl; Ina Carolin Ennker; Manfred Mauser; Ines Florath
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.620

5.  Long-term safety and effectiveness of mechanical versus biologic aortic valve prostheses in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database.

Authors:  J Matthew Brennan; Fred H Edwards; Yue Zhao; Sean O'Brien; Michael E Booth; Rachel S Dokholyan; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit?

Authors:  Alexander Kulik; Manal Al-Saigh; Vincent Chan; Roy G Masters; Pierre Bédard; B-Khanh Lam; Fraser D Rubens; Paul J Hendry; Thierry G Mesana; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Stefano Urso; Rafael Sadaba; Gonzalo Aldamiz-Echevarria
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-06-04

8.  Aortic annular enlargement during aortic valve replacement: improving results with time.

Authors:  Mark D Peterson; Michael A Borger; Christopher M Feindel; Tirone E David
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Aortic root enlargement: what are the operative risks?

Authors:  Jayesh Dhareshwar; Thoralf M Sundt; Joseph A Dearani; Hartzell V Schaff; David J Cook; Thomas A Orszulak
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Dania Mohty; Jean G Dumesnil; Najmeddine Echahidi; Patrick Mathieu; François Dagenais; Pierre Voisine; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics of functional recovery after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japanese octogenarians.

Authors:  Ryo Tobita; Kentaro Iwata; Kenta Kamisaka; Satoshi Yuguchi; Masayuki Tahara; Keisuke Oura; Tomoyuki Morisawa; Satoko Ohhashi; Megumi Kumamaru; Yusuke Hanafusa; Michitaka Kato; Masakazu Saitoh; Koji Sakurada; Tetsuya Takahashi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-02-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.