Literature DB >> 27677815

Mimics here and there, but not everywhere: Müllerian mimicry in Ceroglossus ground beetles?

Carlos P Muñoz-Ramírez1, Pierre-Paul Bitton2, Stéphanie M Doucet2, Lacey L Knowles3.   

Abstract

The ground beetle genus Ceroglossus contains co-distributed species that show pronounced intraspecific diversity in the form of geographical colour morphs. While colour morphs among different species appear to match in some geographical regions, in others, there is little apparent colour matching. Mimicry is a potential explanation for covariation in colour patterns, but it is not clear whether the degree of sympatric colour matching is higher than expected by chance given the obvious mismatches among morphs in some regions. Here, we used reflectance spectrometry to quantify elytral coloration from the perspective of an avian predator to test whether colour similarity between species is, indeed, higher in sympatry. After finding no significant phylogenetic signal in the colour data, analyses showed strong statistical support for sympatric colour similarity between species despite the apparent lack of colour matching in some areas. We hypothesize Müllerian mimicry as the responsible mechanism for sympatric colour similarity in Ceroglossus and discuss potential explanations and future directions to elucidate why mimicry has not developed similar levels of interspecific colour resemblance across space.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Carabidae; Müllerian mimicry; Southern South America; colour mismatch; colour quantification

Year:  2016        PMID: 27677815      PMCID: PMC5046924          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  15 in total

1.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Heather D Penney; Christopher Hassall; Jeffrey H Skevington; Kevin R Abbott; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Diversity in Müllerian mimicry: The optimal predator sampling strategy explains both local and regional polymorphism in prey.

Authors:  Thomas G Aubier; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Selection overrides gene flow to break down maladaptive mimicry.

Authors:  George R Harper; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs.

Authors:  Brice P Noonan; Aaron A Comeault
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Poor statistical performance of the Mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon; Richard E Glor
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Evolution of avian plumage color in a tetrahedral color space: a phylogenetic analysis of new world buntings.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Mimics here and there, but not everywhere: Müllerian mimicry in Ceroglossus ground beetles?

Authors:  Carlos P Muñoz-Ramírez; Pierre-Paul Bitton; Stéphanie M Doucet; Lacey L Knowles
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution.

Authors:  A V Brower
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Warning signals are under positive frequency-dependent selection in nature.

Authors:  Mathieu Chouteau; Mónica Arias; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mimics here and there, but not everywhere: Müllerian mimicry in Ceroglossus ground beetles?

Authors:  Carlos P Muñoz-Ramírez; Pierre-Paul Bitton; Stéphanie M Doucet; Lacey L Knowles
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  HyRAD-X Exome Capture Museomics Unravels Giant Ground Beetle Evolution.

Authors:  Emmanuel F A Toussaint; Jérémy Gauthier; Julia Bilat; Conrad P D T Gillett; Harlan M Gough; Håkan Lundkvist; Mickael Blanc; Carlos P Muñoz-Ramírez; Nadir Alvarez
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.416

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.