Literature DB >> 11747559

Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Müllerian mimicry hypothesis.

R Symula1, R Schulte, K Summers.   

Abstract

Examples of Müllerian mimicry, in which resemblance between unpalatable species confers mutual benefit, are rare in vertebrates. Strong comparative evidence for mimicry is found when the colour and pattern of a single species closely resemble several different model species simultaneously in different geographical regions. Todemonstrate this, it is necessary to provide compelling evidence that the putative mimics do, in fact, form a monophyletic group. We present molecular phylogenetic evidence that the poison frog Dendrobates imitator mimics three different poison frogs in different geographical regions in Peru. DNA sequences from four different mitochondrial gene regions in putative members of a single species are analysed using parsimony, maximum-likelihood and neighbour-joining methods. The resulting hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships demonstrate that the different populations of D.imitator form a monophyletic group. To our knowledge, these results provide the first evidence for a Müllerian mimetic radiation in amphibians in which a single species mimics different sympatric species in different geographical regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11747559      PMCID: PMC1088895          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics.

Authors:  N Goldman; J P Anderson; A G Rodrigo
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Coral snake mimicry: does it occur?

Authors:  H W Greene; R W McDiarmid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Phenotypic and genetic divergence in three species of dart-poison frogs with contrasting parental behavior.

Authors:  K Summers; E Bermingham; L Weigt; S McCafferty; L Dahlstrom
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.

Authors:  D Posada; K A Crandall
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.

Authors:  J D Thompson; T J Gibson; F Plewniak; F Jeanmougin; D G Higgins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution.

Authors:  F Rodríguez; J L Oliver; A Marín; J R Medina
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-02-22       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Phylogeny determination using dynamically weighted parsimony method.

Authors:  P L Williams; W M Fitch
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Visual mate choice in poison frogs.

Authors:  K Summers; R Symula; M Clough; T Cronin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry.

Authors:  D D Kapan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Classification of skin alkaloids from neotropical poison-dart frogs (Dendrobatidae).

Authors:  J W Daly; G B Brown; M Mensah-Dwumah; C W Myers
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.033

View more
  35 in total

1.  Convergent evolution of bright coloration and toxicity in frogs.

Authors:  Kyle Summers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Batesian mimics influence mimicry ring evolution.

Authors:  Daniel W Franks; Jason Noble
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The importance of pattern similarity between Müllerian mimics in predator avoidance learning.

Authors:  Candy Rowe; Leena Lindström; Anne Lyytinen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolutionary biology: Catfish mimics.

Authors:  James Mallet; Kanchon Dasmahapatra
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges.

Authors:  Miguel Vences; Meike Thomas; Ronald M Bonett; David R Vieites
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evidence for a Müllerian mimetic radiation in Asian pitvipers.

Authors:  K L Sanders; A Malhotra; R S Thorpe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  A Müllerian mimicry ring in Appalachian millipedes.

Authors:  Paul E Marek; Jason E Bond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Interspecific visual signalling in animals and plants: a functional classification.

Authors:  Tim Caro; William L Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Unsupervised machine learning reveals mimicry complexes in bumblebees occur along a perceptual continuum.

Authors:  Briana D Ezray; Drew C Wham; Carrie E Hill; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Inference of population history by coupling exploratory and model-driven phylogeographic analyses.

Authors:  Ryan C Garrick; Adalgisa Caccone; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.