Literature DB >> 19468091

Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients.

Hoangmai H Pham1, Bruce E Landon, James D Reschovsky, Beny Wu, Deborah Schrag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most quality metrics focus on underuse of services, leaving unclear what factors are associated with potential overuse.
METHODS: We analyzed Medicare claims from 2000-2002 and 2004-2006 for 35 039 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with acute low back pain (LBP) who were treated by 1 of 4567 primary care physicians responding to the 2000-2001 or 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study Physician Surveys. We modified a measure of inappropriate imaging developed by the National Committee on Quality Assurance. We characterized the rapidity (<28 days, 29-180 days, none within 180 days) and modality of imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging [CT/MRI], only radiograph, or no imaging). We used ordered logit models to assess relationships between imaging and patient demographics and physician/practice characteristics including exposure to financial incentives based on patient satisfaction, clinical quality, cost profiling, or productivity.
RESULTS: Of 35 039 beneficiaries with LBP, 28.8% underwent imaging within 28 days and an additional 4.6% between 28 and 180 days. Among patients who received imaging, 88.2% received radiography, while 11.8% received CT/MRI as their initial study. White patients received higher levels of imaging than black patients or those of other races. Medicaid patients received less rapid or advanced imaging than other patients. Patients had higher levels of imaging if their primary care physician worked in large practices. Compared with no incentives, clinical quality-based incentives were associated with less advanced imaging (10.5% vs 1.4% for within 28 days; P < .001), whereas incentive combinations including satisfaction measures were associated with more rapid and advanced imaging. Results persisted in multivariate analyses and when the outcome was redefined as the number of imaging studies performed.
CONCLUSIONS: Rapidity and modality of imaging for LBP is associated with patient and physician characteristics but the directionality of associations with desirable care processes is opposite of associations for measures targeting underuse. Metrics that encompass overuse may suggest new areas of focus for quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19468091      PMCID: PMC2854511          DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  26 in total

Review 1.  Low back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; J N Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  National quality monitoring of Medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care.

Authors:  E C Schneider; A M Zaslavsky; B E Landon; T R Lied; S Sheingold; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Revisiting the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Mark R Chassin; Stanley Tuhrim; Larry H Hollier; A John Popp; Enrico Ascher; Herbert Dardik; Glenn Faust; Thomas S Riles
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; Ramsey C Tate; J Lee Hargraves
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Alan M Zaslavsky; Shulamit L Bernard; Matthew J Cioffi; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Growth of single-specialty medical groups.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Hoangmai Pham; Gloria Bazzoli
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Cascade effects of medical technology.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; A L Potosky; J M Legler; J L Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Patients' role in the use of radiology testing for common office practice complaints.

Authors:  I B Wilson; K Dukes; S Greenfield; S Kaplan; B Hillman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-01-22

10.  Quality monitoring of physicians: linking patients' experiences of care to clinical quality and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Eric C Schneider; Michael Anastario; Esosa G Odigie; Richard Marshall; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  22 in total

1.  Can Parsimonious Practice Please Patients and Practitioners? The Case of Spine Imaging.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Analysis of Physician Variation in Provision of Low-Value Services.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Anupam B Jena; Alan M Zaslavsky; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Creating a parsimonious typology of physician financial incentives.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; James D Reschovsky; Hoangmai H Pham; Panagiota Kitsantas; Janusz Wojtuskiak; Jack Hadley
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Ellen P McCarthy; Roger B Davis; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Practice variation in PEG tube placement: trends and predictors among providers in the United States.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Michelle Nazareth; Justin L Sewell; J Lucas Williams; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Factors Contributing to Variations in Physicians' Use of Evidence at The Point of Care: A Conceptual Model.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Eugene C Rich; Timothy K Lake
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work.

Authors:  G P G Lemmers; W van Lankveld; G P Westert; P J van der Wees; J B Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The role of MRI in musculoskeletal practice: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Gail Dean Deyle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-08

Review 10.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.