Literature DB >> 20976118

Creating a parsimonious typology of physician financial incentives.

Bruce E Landon1, James D Reschovsky, Hoangmai H Pham, Panagiota Kitsantas, Janusz Wojtuskiak, Jack Hadley.   

Abstract

In order to create an empirically derived parsimonious typology of physician financial incentives that will be useful for future research, we used data from the nationally representative 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study Physician Survey (N = 6,628). Linear regression analyses informed by economic theory were used to identify the combinations of incentives associated with an overall financial incentive to expand services to individual patients. The approach was validated using two nonparametric methods (CART analysis and data mining techniques) and by examining the relationship between the resulting typology and other measures of physician behavior including hours worked, visit volume, and specialty-adjusted income. Of the 6,628 physicians surveyed, approximately 25% (1,605) reported an overall incentive to increase services and 75% (5,023) reported either neutral incentives or incentives to decrease services. Men, who were approximately 75% of respondents, were slightly more likely to report incentives to increase services (P < 0.05). There were no differences in reported incentives according to specialty. We created two typologies (one with eleven categories and the other with a collapsed set of six categories) based on combinations of variables measuring ownership, base compensation methods, and financial incentives. The percentage with an overall incentive to increase services ranges from 6% for employed physicians compensated via fixed salary to 36.7% for owners in low capitation environments with either individual or practice level productivity incentives. The criterion validity of the typology was established by examining the relationship with adjusted physician income, hours worked, and visit volume, which showed generally consistent relationships in the expected direction. A parsimonious typology consisting of six mutually exclusive groups reasonably captures the continuum of incentives to increase service delivery experienced by physicians.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20976118      PMCID: PMC2956986          DOI: 10.1007/s10742-010-0057-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol        ISSN: 1387-3741


  22 in total

1.  Physicians' responses to Medicare fee schedule reductions.

Authors:  J M Mitchell; J Hadley; D J Gaskin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The growth of managed care and changes in physicians' incomes, autonomy, and satisfaction, 1991-1997.

Authors:  Jack Hadley; Jean M Mitchell
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2002-03

3.  Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Rushika Fernandopulle; HyunSook Ryu Song; Bruce Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Physician responses to fee-for-service and capitation payment.

Authors:  S C Stearns; B L Wolfe; D A Kindig
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Physician compensation models in medical group practice.

Authors:  D A Conrad; J Noren; M Marcus-Smith; S Ramsey; H Kirz; T Wickizer; E Perrin; A Ross
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  1996-10

6.  Effects of physician-owned limited-service hospitals: evidence from Arizona.

Authors:  Jean M Mitchell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Health spending in OECD countries in 2004: an update.

Authors:  Gerard F Anderson; Bianca K Frogner; Uwe E Reinhardt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care.

Authors:  B E Landon; I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Primary care physician compensation method in medical groups: does it influence the use and cost of health services for enrollees in managed care organizations?

Authors:  D A Conrad; C Maynard; A Cheadle; S Ramsey; M Marcus-Smith; H Kirz; C A Madden; D Martin; E B Perrin; T Wickizer; B Zierler; A Ross; J Noren; S Y Liang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-03-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Bruce E Landon; James D Reschovsky; Beny Wu; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-25
View more
  5 in total

1.  Following the money: factors associated with the cost of treating high-cost Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Jack Hadley; Cynthia B Saiontz-Martinez; Ellyn R Boukus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The relationship between physician compensation strategies and the intensity of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; James D Reschovsky; A James O'Malley; Hoangmai H Pham; Jack Hadley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Regional differences in healthcare delivery for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Physician Compensation Arrangements and Financial Performance Incentives in US Health Systems.

Authors:  Rachel O Reid; Ashlyn K Tom; Rachel M Ross; Erin L Duffy; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-01-28

5.  The Association Between Primary Care Physician Compensation and Patterns of Care Delivery, 2012-2015.

Authors:  Adrian Garcia Mosqueira; Meredith Rosenthal; Michael L Barnett
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.