Literature DB >> 11176741

Patients' role in the use of radiology testing for common office practice complaints.

I B Wilson1, K Dukes, S Greenfield, S Kaplan, B Hillman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiological studies are an important component of ambulatory medical costs, and guidelines often focus on their appropriate use. However, little is known about the correlates of the use of those services, particularly the influence of patients' preferences on physicians' utilization decisions.
OBJECTIVES: To study patients presenting for outpatient treatment of respiratory problems and low back pain, and to examine the magnitude of the effect of the patients' perceived need for radiological studies (radiology preference score) on use of those services.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Office practices of generalist physicians in predominantly rural areas of 8 states. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 52 generalist physicians agreed to enroll consecutive Medicare-eligible patients making office visits for respiratory problems or low back pain. Of 1785 eligible patients invited to participate, 132 (7%) refused and 1137 (69%) of 1653 returned questionnaires. MEASUREMENTS: Radiology utilization rates (plain film, computed tomographic scan, or magnetic resonance image scan) were determined by patient self-report. To assess perceived need for radiological studies, we asked patients how necessary they believed an x-ray film was in the evaluation of 4 common complaints (respiratory problems, low back pain, knee pain, and knee swelling). A summary radiology preference score was created from 3 of the 4 items, excluding the item referring to the patients' index complaint.
RESULTS: Six hundred fifteen respiratory and 522 low back pain patients were enrolled; mean ages were 69 and 64 years, respectively. Radiology utilization rates were 37% for respiratory and 26% for low back pain patients. In multiple logistic regression models, for respiratory patients radiology utilization was related significantly to the radiology preference score (odds ratio [OR] for fourth quartile compared with first quartile, 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.37; P = .02), to having a physician who owned radiology equipment (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.23-2.66; P = .002), and current smoking (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04-2.41; P = .03). For low back pain patients, radiology utilization was significantly related to the radiology preference score (OR for fourth compared with first quartile, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.29-5.06; P = .007), bothersomeness of the pain (OR for fourth compared with first quartile, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.74-8.04; P<.001), and a diagnosis of osteoporosis (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.75; P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceived need for radiological studies was significantly associated with use of those services for outpatients with respiratory problems and low back pain. These findings suggest that patients communicate their wishes to physicians, either directly or indirectly, regarding services they think are necessary. Differences in physicians' adherence to guidelines regarding radiology utilization may in part reflect variations in patients' perceived need for those services. Efforts to educate patients about when radiological studies are medically indicated may be an important complement to practice guidelines or other utilization-related financial incentives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176741     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.2.256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  16 in total

1.  Can Parsimonious Practice Please Patients and Practitioners? The Case of Spine Imaging.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state.

Authors:  Todd M Emch; Michael T Modic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work.

Authors:  G P G Lemmers; W van Lankveld; G P Westert; P J van der Wees; J B Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Declining trend in the use of repeat computed tomography for trauma patients admitted to a level I trauma center for traffic-related injuries.

Authors:  Kevin J Psoter; Bahman S Roudsari; Janessa M Graves; Christopher Mack; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Systematic overuse of healthcare services: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Najlla Nassery; Jodi B Segal; Eva Chang; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.561

7.  Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Bruce E Landon; James D Reschovsky; Beny Wu; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-25

8.  Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.

Authors:  Joel M Schectman; W Scott Schroth; Dante Verme; John D Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine.

Authors:  Andrew J Foy; Edward J Filippone
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-06-13

10.  What causes increasing and unnecessary use of radiological investigations? A survey of radiologists' perceptions.

Authors:  Kristin B Lysdahl; Bjørn M Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.