Literature DB >> 11717573

National quality monitoring of Medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care.

E C Schneider1, A M Zaslavsky, B E Landon, T R Lied, S Sheingold, P D Cleary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical quality of health plans varies. The associations between different measures of health plan quality are incompletely understood.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between enrollee reports on the quality of health plans as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS 2.0) survey and the clinical quality of care measured by the Medicare Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS).
DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SAMPLE: National sample of 233 Medicare health plans that reported data using the CAHPS 2.0 survey and Medicare HEDIS during 1998. MEASURES: Five composite measures and four ratings derived from the CAHPS survey and six measures of clinical quality from Medicare HEDIS.
RESULTS: Two composite measures ("getting needed care" and "health plan information and customer service") were significantly associated with most of the HEDIS clinical quality measures. The proportion of enrollees having a personal doctor was also significantly associated with rates of mammography, eye exams for diabetics, beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction, and follow-up after mental health hospitalization. Enrollees' ratings of health plan care were less consistently associated with HEDIS performance. In multivariable analyses, the measure of health plan communication ("health plan information and customer service") was the most consistent predictor of HEDIS performance.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of associations we observed among some of the measures suggests that the CAHPS survey and HEDIS are complementary quality monitoring strategies. Our results suggest that health plans that provide better access and customer service also provide better clinical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11717573     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200112000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  40 in total

1.  Mitigating the Problem of Unmeasured Outcomes in Quality Reports.

Authors:  Jacob Glazer; Thomas McGuire; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  B E J Econom Anal Policy       Date:  2008-01

2.  Creating accountable care organizations: the extended hospital medical staff.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Douglas O Staiger; Julie P W Bynum; Daniel J Gottlieb
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mala Rao; Aileen Clarke; Colin Sanderson; Richard Hammersley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-22

4.  Does affiliation of physician groups with one another produce higher quality primary care?

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Kathryn L Coltin; Steven D Pearson; Ken P Kleinman; Jie Zheng; Janice A Singer; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Using global ratings of health plans to improve the quality of health care.

Authors:  Jacob Glazer; Thomas G McGuire; Zhun Cao; Alan Zaslavsky
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: A reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer.

Authors:  Matthew S Cefalu; Marc N Elliott; Claude M Setodji; Paul D Cleary; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety.

Authors:  Thomas Isaac; Alan M Zaslavsky; Paul D Cleary; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Family satisfaction in the ICU: why should ICU clinicians care?

Authors:  Anneliese M Schleyer; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Association between angina and treatment satisfaction after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mary E Plomondon; David J Magid; Frederick A Masoudi; Philip G Jones; Lisa C Barry; Edward Havranek; Eric D Peterson; Harlan M Krumholz; John A Spertus; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.