Literature DB >> 19467883

Comparison of different signal thresholds on data dependent sampling in Orbitrap and LTQ mass spectrometry for the identification of peptides and proteins in complex mixtures.

Catherine C L Wong1, Daniel Cociorva, John D Venable, Tao Xu, John R Yates.   

Abstract

We evaluate the effect of ion-abundance threshold settings for data-dependent acquisition on a hybrid LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer, analyzing features such as the total number of spectra collected, the signal to noise ratio of the full MS scans, the spectral quality of the tandem mass spectra acquired, and the number of peptides and proteins identified from a complex mixture. We find that increasing the threshold for data-dependent acquisition generally decreases the quantity but increases the quality of the spectra acquired. This is especially true when the threshold setting is set above the noise level of the full MS scan. We compare two distinct experimental configurations: one where full MS scans are acquired in the Orbitrap analyzer while tandem MS scans are acquired in the LTQ analyzer, and one where both full MS and tandem MS scans are acquired in the LTQ analyzer. We examine the number of spectra, peptides, and proteins identified under various threshold conditions, and we find that the optimal threshold setting is at or below the respective noise level of the instrument regardless of whether the full MS scan is performed in the Orbitrap or in the LTQ analyzer. When comparing the high-throughput identification performance of the two analyzers, we conclude that, used at optimal threshold levels, the LTQ and the Orbitrap identify similar numbers of peptides and proteins. The higher scan speed of the LTQ, which results in more spectra being collected, is roughly compensated by the higher mass accuracy of the Orbitrap, which results in improved database searching and peptide validation software performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19467883      PMCID: PMC2946190          DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  12 in total

1.  A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data.

Authors:  Michael J MacCoss; Christine C Wu; Hongbin Liu; Rovshan Sadygov; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Factors that affect ion trap data-dependent MS/MS in proteomics.

Authors:  Brett R Wenner; Bert C Lynn
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Automatic quality assessment of peptide tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Marshall Bern; David Goldberg; W Hayes McDonald; John R Yates
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  MS1, MS2, and SQT-three unified, compact, and easily parsed file formats for the storage of shotgun proteomic spectra and identifications.

Authors:  W Hayes McDonald; David L Tabb; Rovshan G Sadygov; Michael J MacCoss; John Venable; Johannes Graumann; Jeff R Johnson; Daniel Cociorva; John R Yates
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb; W Hayes McDonald; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome.

Authors:  Junmin Peng; Joshua E Elias; Carson C Thoreen; Larry J Licklider; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Data-controlled automation of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analysis of peptide mixtures.

Authors:  D C Stahl; K M Swiderek; M T Davis; T D Lee
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Validation of tandem mass spectrometry database search results using DTASelect.

Authors:  Daniel Cociorva; David L Tabb; John R Yates
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01

9.  Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  A J Link; J Eng; D M Schieltz; E Carmack; G J Mize; D R Morris; B M Garvik; J R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Analysis of quantitative proteomic data generated via multidimensional protein identification technology.

Authors:  Michael P Washburn; Ryan Ulaszek; Cosmin Deciu; David M Schieltz; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  14 in total

1.  Biomarker discovery and clinical proteomics.

Authors:  Jerzy Silberring; Pawel Ciborowski
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 12.296

Review 2.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Assessment of resolution parameters for CID-based shotgun proteomic experiments on the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer.

Authors:  Min-Sik Kim; Kumaran Kandasamy; Raghothama Chaerkady; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  A low molecular weight proteome comparison of fertile and male sterile 8 anthers of Zea mays.

Authors:  Dongxue Wang; Christopher M Adams; John F Fernandes; Rachel L Egger; Virginia Walbot
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Optimization of mass spectrometric parameters improve the identification performance of capillary zone electrophoresis for single-shot bottom-up proteomics analysis.

Authors:  Zhenbin Zhang; Norman J Dovichi
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 6.558

6.  Improving proteome coverage on a LTQ-Orbitrap using design of experiments.

Authors:  Genna L Andrews; Ralph A Dean; Adam M Hawkridge; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Improving the comprehensiveness and sensitivity of sheathless capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry for proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Yueju Wang; Bryan R Fonslow; Catherine C L Wong; Aleksey Nakorchevsky; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  A tool to evaluate correspondence between extraction ion chromatographic peaks and peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics experiments.

Authors:  Cristian I Ruse; Samantha Peacock; Cornel Ghiban; Keith Rivera; Darryl J Pappin; Peter Leopold
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Estimation of low-level components lost through chromatographic separations with finite detection limits.

Authors:  Nicole M Devitt; Joe M Davis; Mark R Schure
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Evaluation and optimization of mass spectrometric settings during data-dependent acquisition mode: focus on LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzers.

Authors:  Anastasia Kalli; Geoffrey T Smith; Michael J Sweredoski; Sonja Hess
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.