Literature DB >> 19466649

Testing communication strategies to convey genomic concepts using virtual reality technology.

Kimberly A Kaphingst1, Susan Persky, Cade McCall, Christina Lachance, Andrew C Beall, Jim Blascovich.   

Abstract

Health professionals need to be able to communicate information about genomic susceptibility in understandable and usable ways, but substantial challenges are involved. We developed four learning modules that varied along two factors: (1) learning mode (active learning vs. didactic learning) and (2) metaphor (risk elevator vs. bridge) and tested them using a 2 x 2 between-subjects, repeated measures design. The study used an innovative virtual reality technology experimental platform; four virtual worlds were designed to convey the concept that genetic and behavioral factors interact to affect common disease risk. The primary outcome was comprehension (recall, transfer). Study participants were 42 undergraduates aged 19-23. The results indicated that the elevator metaphor better supported learning of the concept than the bridge metaphor. Mean transfer score was significantly higher for the elevator metaphor (p < 0.05). Mean change in recall was significantly higher for didactic learning than active learning (p < 0.05). Mean ratings for variables posited to be associated with better learning (e.g., motivation), however, were generally higher for the active learning worlds. The results suggested that active learning might not always be more effective than didactic learning in increasing comprehension of health information. The findings also indicated that less complex metaphors might convey abstract concepts more effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466649      PMCID: PMC2767374          DOI: 10.1080/10810730902873927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  14 in total

1.  Evolving genomic metaphors: a new look at the language of DNA.

Authors:  J C Avise
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Metaphors in behavioral genetics.

Authors:  A Nordgren
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003

3.  The case for coherence in scientific explanations: quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding.

Authors:  Richard E Mayer; Joshua Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2005-03

4.  A qualitative evaluation of the Harvard Cancer Risk Index.

Authors:  K M Emmons; S Koch-Weser; K Atwood; L Conboy; R Rudd; G Colditz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep

5.  An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  M J Green; B B Biesecker; A M McInerney; D Mauger; N Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-09-15

6.  General public's knowledge, interest and information needs related to genetic cancer: an exploratory study.

Authors:  I Mesters; A Ausems; H De Vries
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science.

Authors:  F S Collins; V A McKusick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Richard Gonzalez; Kara J Milliron; Victor J Strecher; Sofia D Merajver
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Behavioral health outcomes associated with religious faith and media exposure about human genetics.

Authors:  Roxanne Parrott; Kami Silk; Janice Raup Krieger; Tina Harris; Celeste Condit
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2004

10.  Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments.

Authors:  Jeremy N Bailenson; Jim Blascovich; Andrew C Beall; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Public understanding of risks from gene-environment interaction in common diseases: implications for public communications.

Authors:  C M Condit; L Shen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Immersive virtual environment technology: a promising tool for future social and behavioral genomics research and practice.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

3.  Testing the effects of educational strategies on comprehension of a genomic concept using virtual reality technology.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Susan Persky; Cade McCall; Christina Lachance; Johanna Loewenstein; Andrew C Beall; Jim Blascovich
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-05-05

4.  Presence relates to distinct outcomes in two virtual environments employing different learning modalities.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Cade McCall; Christina Lachance; Andrew C Beall; Jim Blascovich
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2009-06

Review 5.  Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Targeting Neuroinflammation After Stroke.

Authors:  Olivera Rajkovic; Geoffrey Potjewyd; Emmanuel Pinteaux
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Community perspectives on treating asymptomatic infections for malaria elimination in The Gambia.

Authors:  Fatou Jaiteh; Yoriko Masunaga; Joseph Okebe; Umberto D'Alessandro; Julie Balen; John Bradley; Charlotte Gryseels; Joan Muela Ribera; Koen Peeters Grietens
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Qualitative study of comprehension of heritability in genomics studies among the Yoruba in Nigeria.

Authors:  Rasheed O Taiwo; John Ipadeola; Temilola Yusuf; Faith Fagbohunlu; Gbemisola Jenfa; Sally N Adebamowo; Clement A Adebamowo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.