Literature DB >> 15677898

General public's knowledge, interest and information needs related to genetic cancer: an exploratory study.

I Mesters1, A Ausems, H De Vries.   

Abstract

Single-group interviews were conducted with 49 people to get an idea of what and how the general public thinks about genetic cancer. Understanding what people think and need is crucial for adequate public health communication about genetic issues. Group discussions revealed that people believed that the vulnerability for cancer was largely dependent on their lifestyle, and that they were at risk if cancer ran in their family. Participants found it difficult to distinguish cancer from genetic cancer since in both cases the cause was related to cell problems. People felt that they lacked adequate knowledge of genetic cancer, which was also confirmed by the misconceptions revealed during the discussions. Participants mentioned both advantages (knowing one's risk, performing preventive actions, more openness, less taboo, and more knowledge) and disadvantages (fear arousal, difficult to time, undirected, tenability) of receiving genetic information. Although people felt ambivalent about wanting to receive genetic cancer information, as yet the general tendency seemed to be to postpone opening up to such information until there was a relevant case in the family. Subsequently, preferred information sources were family members and health professionals. According to the participants mass media should provide information on relevant features of genetic cancer to look out for. As yet, people showed little interest in biological genetic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677898     DOI: 10.1097/00008469-200502000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  19 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Testing communication strategies to convey genomic concepts using virtual reality technology.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Susan Persky; Cade McCall; Christina Lachance; Andrew C Beall; Jim Blascovich
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-06

Review 3.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Public attitudes towards genomic risk profiling as a component of routine population screening.

Authors:  S G Nicholls; B J Wilson; S M Craigie; H Etchegary; D Castle; J C Carroll; B K Potter; L Lemyre; J Little
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.166

5.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  From the laboratory to the clinic: sharing BRCA VUS reclassification tools with practicing genetics professionals.

Authors:  Bianca M Augusto; Paige Lake; Courtney L Scherr; Fergus J Couch; Noralane M Lindor; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-09

7.  Breast cancer genetic counselling referrals: how comparable are the findings between the UK and the Netherlands?

Authors:  Akke Albada; Julie Werrett; Sandra Van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Cyril Chapman; Margreet G E M Ausems; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-08-18

8.  Testing the effects of educational strategies on comprehension of a genomic concept using virtual reality technology.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Susan Persky; Cade McCall; Christina Lachance; Johanna Loewenstein; Andrew C Beall; Jim Blascovich
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-05-05

9.  Testicular cancer and genetics knowledge among familial testicular cancer family members.

Authors:  June A Peters; Ellen B Beckjord; Deliya R Banda Ryan; Ann G Carr; Susan T Vadaparampil; Jennifer T Loud; Larissa Korde; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters.

Authors:  Emily Brown; Megan Skinner; Stephanie Ashley; Kate Reed; Shannan DeLany Dixon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.