Literature DB >> 19409749

Testing the effects of educational strategies on comprehension of a genomic concept using virtual reality technology.

Kimberly A Kaphingst1, Susan Persky, Cade McCall, Christina Lachance, Johanna Loewenstein, Andrew C Beall, Jim Blascovich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Applying genetic susceptibility information to improve health will likely require educating patients about abstract concepts, for which there is little existing research. This experimental study examined the effect of learning mode on comprehension of a genomic concept.
METHODS: 156 individuals aged 18-40 without specialized knowledge were randomly assigned to either a virtual reality active learning or didactic learning condition. The outcome was comprehension (recall, transfer, mental models).
RESULTS: Change in recall was greater for didactic learning than for active learning (p<0.001). Mean transfer and change in mental models were also higher for didactic learning (p<0.0001 and p<0.05, respectively). Believability was higher for didactic learning (p<0.05), while ratings for motivation (p<0.05), interest (p<0.0001), and enjoyment (p<0.0001) were higher for active learning, but these variables did not mediate the association between learning mode and comprehension.
CONCLUSION: These results show that learning mode affects comprehension, but additional research is needed regarding how and in what contexts different approaches are best for educating patients about abstract concepts. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Didactic, interpersonal health education approaches may be more effective than interactive games in educating patients about abstract, unfamiliar concepts. These findings indicate the importance of traditional health education approaches in emerging areas like genomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19409749      PMCID: PMC2794484          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  22 in total

Review 1.  Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology.

Authors:  J M Loomis; J J Blascovich; A C Beall
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-11

2.  The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors.

Authors:  R Russell Wilke
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  A controlled trial of active versus passive learning strategies in a large group setting.

Authors:  Paul Haidet; Robert O Morgan; Kimberly O'Malley; Betty Jeanne Moran; Boyd F Richards
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Interpretation of genetic risk feedback among African American smokers with low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Colleen M McBride; Kathryn I Pollak; Pauline Lyna; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  What's the active ingredient in active learning?

Authors:  Geoff Norman
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

7.  An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  M J Green; B B Biesecker; A M McInerney; D Mauger; N Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-09-15

8.  Behavioral health outcomes associated with religious faith and media exposure about human genetics.

Authors:  Roxanne Parrott; Kami Silk; Janice Raup Krieger; Tina Harris; Celeste Condit
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2004

9.  Enhancing the readability of materials describing genetic risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Erica Wahl; Anne Fatone; Karen Brown; Naa Oyo A Kwate; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.302

10.  Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts.

Authors:  Angela D Lanie; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Jane P Sheldon; Sharon L R Kardia; Elizabeth S Anderson; Merle Feldbaum; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  6 in total

1.  Public understanding of risks from gene-environment interaction in common diseases: implications for public communications.

Authors:  C M Condit; L Shen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Genomics education for the public: perspectives of genomic researchers and ELSI advisors.

Authors:  Lynn G Dressler; Sondra Smolek Jones; Janell M Markey; Katherine W Byerly; Megan C Roberts
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2014-02-04

3.  Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Deborah Bowen; Lawrence C Brody; Celeste M Condit; Robert T Croyle; Marta Gwinn; Muin J Khoury; Laura M Koehly; Bruce R Korf; Theresa M Marteau; Kenneth McLeroy; Kevin Patrick; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Presence relates to distinct outcomes in two virtual environments employing different learning modalities.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Cade McCall; Christina Lachance; Andrew C Beall; Jim Blascovich
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2009-06

5.  Characteristics of genetics-related news content in Black weekly newspapers.

Authors:  C A Caburnay; P Babb; K A Kaphingst; J Roberts; S Rath
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Cancer Predisposition Cascade Screening for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndromes in Switzerland: Study Protocol.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Valeria Viassolo; Maria Caiata-Zufferey; Christos Nikolaidis; Nicole Buerki; Karl Heinimann; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Olivia Pagani; Pierre O Chappuis; Rosmarie Bührer-Landolt; Rossella Graffeo; Henrik Csaba Horváth; Christian Kurzeder; Manuela Rabaglio; Michael Scharfe; Corinne Urech; Tobias E Erlanger; Nicole Probst-Hensch
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-09-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.