OBJECTIVE: Applying genetic susceptibility information to improve health will likely require educating patients about abstract concepts, for which there is little existing research. This experimental study examined the effect of learning mode on comprehension of a genomic concept. METHODS:156 individuals aged 18-40 without specialized knowledge were randomly assigned to either a virtual reality active learning or didactic learning condition. The outcome was comprehension (recall, transfer, mental models). RESULTS: Change in recall was greater for didactic learning than for active learning (p<0.001). Mean transfer and change in mental models were also higher for didactic learning (p<0.0001 and p<0.05, respectively). Believability was higher for didactic learning (p<0.05), while ratings for motivation (p<0.05), interest (p<0.0001), and enjoyment (p<0.0001) were higher for active learning, but these variables did not mediate the association between learning mode and comprehension. CONCLUSION: These results show that learning mode affects comprehension, but additional research is needed regarding how and in what contexts different approaches are best for educating patients about abstract concepts. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Didactic, interpersonal health education approaches may be more effective than interactive games in educating patients about abstract, unfamiliar concepts. These findings indicate the importance of traditional health education approaches in emerging areas like genomics.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Applying genetic susceptibility information to improve health will likely require educating patients about abstract concepts, for which there is little existing research. This experimental study examined the effect of learning mode on comprehension of a genomic concept. METHODS: 156 individuals aged 18-40 without specialized knowledge were randomly assigned to either a virtual reality active learning or didactic learning condition. The outcome was comprehension (recall, transfer, mental models). RESULTS: Change in recall was greater for didactic learning than for active learning (p<0.001). Mean transfer and change in mental models were also higher for didactic learning (p<0.0001 and p<0.05, respectively). Believability was higher for didactic learning (p<0.05), while ratings for motivation (p<0.05), interest (p<0.0001), and enjoyment (p<0.0001) were higher for active learning, but these variables did not mediate the association between learning mode and comprehension. CONCLUSION: These results show that learning mode affects comprehension, but additional research is needed regarding how and in what contexts different approaches are best for educating patients about abstract concepts. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Didactic, interpersonal health education approaches may be more effective than interactive games in educating patients about abstract, unfamiliar concepts. These findings indicate the importance of traditional health education approaches in emerging areas like genomics.
Authors: Paul Haidet; Robert O Morgan; Kimberly O'Malley; Betty Jeanne Moran; Boyd F Richards Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2004 Impact factor: 3.853
Authors: Hayley S Thompson; Erica Wahl; Anne Fatone; Karen Brown; Naa Oyo A Kwate; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Angela D Lanie; Toby Epstein Jayaratne; Jane P Sheldon; Sharon L R Kardia; Elizabeth S Anderson; Merle Feldbaum; Elizabeth M Petty Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Lynn G Dressler; Sondra Smolek Jones; Janell M Markey; Katherine W Byerly; Megan C Roberts Journal: Genet Test Mol Biomarkers Date: 2014-02-04
Authors: Colleen M McBride; Deborah Bowen; Lawrence C Brody; Celeste M Condit; Robert T Croyle; Marta Gwinn; Muin J Khoury; Laura M Koehly; Bruce R Korf; Theresa M Marteau; Kenneth McLeroy; Kevin Patrick; Thomas W Valente Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Maria C Katapodi; Valeria Viassolo; Maria Caiata-Zufferey; Christos Nikolaidis; Nicole Buerki; Karl Heinimann; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz; Olivia Pagani; Pierre O Chappuis; Rosmarie Bührer-Landolt; Rossella Graffeo; Henrik Csaba Horváth; Christian Kurzeder; Manuela Rabaglio; Michael Scharfe; Corinne Urech; Tobias E Erlanger; Nicole Probst-Hensch Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-09-20