Literature DB >> 19465292

Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.

Claudia Maria Prospero Ponce1, Karolinne Maia Rocha, Scott D Smith, Ronald R Krueger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare central (CCT) and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT) using Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam), high-speed optical coherence tomography (Visante OCT), and ultrasound (US) pachymetry (Sonogage Corneo-Gage Plus) in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes.
SETTING: Department of Refractive Surgery, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
METHODS: The CCT and PCT were retrospectively measured using US pachymetry, Scheimpflug imaging, and high-speed OCT from January 2006 to March 2008. The influence of age and absolute magnitude of corneal thickness were also analyzed. Analysis was by multivariate generalized estimating equations, multivariate linear regression, and linear regression plots.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three eyes were analyzed. Ultrasound pachymetry CCT measurements were consistently higher than Scheimpflug and OCT measurements (mean difference 6.5 microm +/- 1.8 [SD] and 7.5 +/- 1.4 microm, respectively) (both P<.0005) in normal eyes; the difference was statistically similar and not greater with keratoconus suspicion, age, or absolute magnitude of corneal thickness (P>.05). Scheimpflug measurements were significantly lower than US pachymetry in post-LASIK eyes (P<.0005). There was no statistically significant difference (mean 0.9 +/- 1.4 microm) in Scheimpflug and OCT CCT measurements (P>.5), although Scheimpflug measurements were significantly lower in post-LASIK eyes (P<.0005). Scheimpflug PCT measurements were higher than OCT measurements, showing more agreement with increasing age (P = .017).
CONCLUSIONS: Scheimpflug and OCT CCT measurements were reproducible but always thinner than US pachymetry in normal and keratoconus-suspect eyes. In post-LASIK eyes, OCT pachymetry maps were more accurate than Scheimpflug maps. The influence of age on PCT requires further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19465292     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  36 in total

1.  Pachymetric mapping with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Maolong Tang; Xinbo Zhang; Camila H Salaroli; Jose L Ramos; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Yong-Heng Luo; Qian Zhong; Ping-Bo Ouyang; Xiao-Jian Guo; Xuan-Chu Duan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry.

Authors:  Domenico Schiano Lomoriello; Marco Lombardo; Laura Tranchina; Francesco Oddone; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal thickness in dogs with and without corneal disease.

Authors:  A L Hoehn; S M Thomasy; P H Kass; T Horikawa; M Samuel; O R Shull; K A Stewart; C J Murphy
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement of corneal pachymetry map measurement by time-domain and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jehn-Yu Huang; Melike Pekmezci; Stephanie Yaplee; Shan Lin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Repeatability and comparability of corneal thickness measurements obtained from Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and from ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  Zaina N Al-Mohtaseb; Li Wang; Mitchell P Weikert
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Authors:  Prasanna Venkatesh Ramesh; Kirti Nath Jha; Krishnagopal Srikanth
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  Comparison of Corneal Epithelial Thickness Measurement Between Fourier-Domain OCT and Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy E Yap; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Ronald H Silverman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles.

Authors:  Roxana Ursea; Matthew Feng; Raksha Urs; Arindam RoyChoudhury; Ronald H Silverman
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.