Literature DB >> 19458300

Association of peritoneal dialysis clinic size with clinical outcomes.

Laura C Plantinga1, Nancy E Fink, Fredric O Finkelstein, Neil R Powe, Bernard G Jaar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Very few studies have addressed the relationship between number of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients treated at a clinic (PD clinic size) and clinical outcomes. In a national prospective cohort study of incident PD patients (n = 236, from 26 clinics), we examined whether being treated at a larger PD clinic [>50 PD patients (n = 3 clinics) vs <or=50 PD patients (n = 23 clinics)] was associated with better patient outcomes, including fewer switches to hemodialysis, fewer cardiovascular events, lower cardiovascular mortality, and lower all-cause mortality.
METHODS: Multivariable Cox models were used to assess relative hazards (RHs) for modality switches, cardiovascular events, cardiovascular deaths, and all-cause deaths by PD clinic size. All models were adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and clinic years in operation.
RESULTS: Being treated at a clinic with >50 patients was associated with fewer switches to hemodialysis (RH = 0.13, 95% CI 0.06 - 0.31) and fewer cardiovascular events (RH = 0.62, 95% CI 0.06 - 0.98). No associations of PD clinic size with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality were seen.
CONCLUSION: PD patients treated at clinics with greater numbers of PD patients may have better outcomes in terms of technique failure and cardiovascular morbidity. PD clinic size may act as a proxy of greater PD experience, more focus on the modality, and better PD practices at the clinic, resulting in better outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19458300      PMCID: PMC2686121     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  13 in total

Review 1.  Comorbidity assessment in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis using the index of coexistent disease.

Authors:  N V Athienites; D C Miskulin; G Fernandez; S Bunnapradist; G Simon; M Landa; C H Schmid; S Greenfield; A S Levey; K B Meyer
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Peritoneal dialysis patient training, 2006.

Authors:  Judith Bernardini; Valerie Price; Ana Figueiredo
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Comorbidity and other factors associated with modality selection in incident dialysis patients: the CHOICE Study. Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease.

Authors:  Dana C Miskulin; Klemens B Meyer; Nicolaos V Athienites; Alice A Martin; Norma Terrin; Jane V Marsh; Nancy E Fink; Josef Coresh; Neil R Powe; Mike J Klag; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Lower probability of patient survival with continuous peritoneal dialysis in the United States compared with Canada. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.

Authors:  D N Churchill; K E Thorpe; E F Vonesh; P R Keshaviah
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  D E Schaubel; P G Blake; S S Fenton
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Use of dialysis educators beyond nurses and physicians and outcomes in patients with kidney failure.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Hoangmai H Pham; Nancy E Fink; Haya R Rubin; Bernard G Jaar; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.620

7.  The timing of specialist evaluation in chronic kidney disease and mortality.

Authors:  Kraig S Kinchen; John Sadler; Nancy Fink; Ronald Brookmeyer; Michael J Klag; Andrew S Levey; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Bernard G Jaar; Josef Coresh; Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Michael J Klag; Andrew S Levey; Nathan W Levin; John H Sadler; Alan Kliger; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Frequency of patient-physician contact and patient outcomes in hemodialysis care.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; John H Sadler; Andrew S Levey; Nathan W Levin; Haya R Rubin; Josef Coresh; Michael J Klag; Neil R Powe
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Roel M Huisman; Martin G M Nieuwenhuizen; Frank Th de Charro
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  20 in total

1.  Peritoneal dialysis after cardiothoracic surgery: do it!

Authors:  Isaac Teitelbaum
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  [Peritoneal dialysis--an ideal initial dialysis mode].

Authors:  Heidi Puttinger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-07-02

3.  Translating an understanding of the determinants of technique failure to maximize patient time on peritoneal dialysis?

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Spatial Analysis of Case-Mix and Dialysis Modality Associations.

Authors:  Tamar Phirtskhalaishvili; Florian Bayer; Stephane Edet; Isabelle Bongiovanni; Julien Hogan; Cécile Couchoud
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Neighborhood location, rurality, geography, and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Kenneth Story; Steven Guest; Michelle Fedunyszyn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Peritonitis is still an important factor for withdrawal from peritoneal dialysis therapy in the Tokai area of Japan.

Authors:  Masashi Mizuno; Yasuhiko Ito; Akio Tanaka; Yasuhiro Suzuki; Hideki Hiramatsu; Midoriko Watanabe; Yoshikazu Tsuruta; Teppei Matsuoka; Isao Ito; Hiroshi Tamai; Hirotake Kasuga; Hideaki Shimizu; Hisashi Kurata; Daijo Inaguma; Takeyuki Hiramatsu; Masanobu Horie; Tomohiko Naruse; Shoichi Maruyama; Enyu Imai; Yukio Yuzawa; Seiichi Matsuo
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Recent analysis of status and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in the Tokai area of Japan: the second report of the Tokai peritoneal dialysis registry.

Authors:  Masashi Mizuno; Yasuhiko Ito; Yasuhiro Suzuki; Fumiko Sakata; Yosuke Saka; Takeyuki Hiramatsu; Hirofumi Tamai; Makoto Mizutani; Tomohiko Naruse; Norimi Ohashi; Hirotake Kasuga; Hideaki Shimizu; Hisashi Kurata; Kei Kurata; Satoshi Suzuki; Satoko Kido; Yoshikazu Tsuruta; Teppei Matsuoka; Masanobu Horie; Shoichi Maruyama; Seiichi Matsuo
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 9.  Comparative outcomes between continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Scott D Bieber; John Burkart; Thomas A Golper; Isaac Teitelbaum; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Structured outpatient peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion is safe and cost-saving.

Authors:  Tapani E Salonen; Heikki Saha
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.