Tamar Phirtskhalaishvili1, Florian Bayer2, Stephane Edet3, Isabelle Bongiovanni4, Julien Hogan5, Cécile Couchoud6. 1. REIN registry, Agence de la biomédecine, France Children's Medical Centre "Mrcheveli," Tbilissi, Georgia. 2. REIN registry, Agence de la biomédecine, France. 3. Nephrology Unit, Dieppe Hospital, France. 4. Department of Economic Evaluation and Public Health, Haute Autorité de Santé, France. 5. REIN registry, Agence de la biomédecine, France Nephrology Unit, Robert Debré, University Hospital, Paris, France. 6. REIN registry, Agence de la biomédecine, France cecile.couchoud@biomedecine.fr.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: ♦ BACKGROUND: Health-care systems must attempt to provide appropriate, high-quality, and economically sustainable care that meets the needs and choices of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). France offers 9 different modalities of dialysis, each characterized by dialysis technique, the extent of professional assistance, and the treatment site. The aim of this study was 1) to describe the various dialysis modalities in France and the patient characteristics associated with each of them, and 2) to analyze their regional patterns to identify possible unexpected associations between case-mixes and dialysis modalities. ♦ METHODS: The clinical characteristics of the 37,421 adult patients treated by dialysis were described according to their treatment modality. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was used to aggregate the regions into clusters according to their use of these modalities and the characteristics of their patients. ♦ RESULT: The gradient of patient characteristics was similar from home hemodialyis (HD) to in-center HD and from non-assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) to assisted continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Analyzing their spatial distribution, we found differences in the patient case-mix on dialysis across regions but also differences in the health-care provided for them. The classification of the regions into 6 different clusters allowed us to detect some unexpected associations between case-mixes and treatment modalities. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: The 9 modalities of treatment available make it theoretically possible to adapt treatment to patients' clinical characteristics and abilities. However, although we found an overall appropriate association of dialysis modalities to the case-mix, major inter-region heterogeneity and the low rate of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home HD suggest that factors besides patients' clinical conditions impact the choice of dialysis modality. The French organization should now be evaluated in terms of patients' quality of life, satisfaction, survival, and global efficiency.
UNLABELLED: ♦ BACKGROUND: Health-care systems must attempt to provide appropriate, high-quality, and economically sustainable care that meets the needs and choices of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). France offers 9 different modalities of dialysis, each characterized by dialysis technique, the extent of professional assistance, and the treatment site. The aim of this study was 1) to describe the various dialysis modalities in France and the patient characteristics associated with each of them, and 2) to analyze their regional patterns to identify possible unexpected associations between case-mixes and dialysis modalities. ♦ METHODS: The clinical characteristics of the 37,421 adult patients treated by dialysis were described according to their treatment modality. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was used to aggregate the regions into clusters according to their use of these modalities and the characteristics of their patients. ♦ RESULT: The gradient of patient characteristics was similar from home hemodialyis (HD) to in-center HD and from non-assisted automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) to assisted continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Analyzing their spatial distribution, we found differences in the patient case-mix on dialysis across regions but also differences in the health-care provided for them. The classification of the regions into 6 different clusters allowed us to detect some unexpected associations between case-mixes and treatment modalities. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: The 9 modalities of treatment available make it theoretically possible to adapt treatment to patients' clinical characteristics and abilities. However, although we found an overall appropriate association of dialysis modalities to the case-mix, major inter-region heterogeneity and the low rate of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home HD suggest that factors besides patients' clinical conditions impact the choice of dialysis modality. The French organization should now be evaluated in terms of patients' quality of life, satisfaction, survival, and global efficiency.
Authors: Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Milton C Weinstein; Murray A Mittleman; Robert J Glynn; Joseph S Pliskin Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Allan J Collins; Robert N Foley; Blanche Chavers; David Gilbertson; Charles Herzog; Kirsten Johansen; Bertram Kasiske; Nancy Kutner; Jiannong Liu; Wendy St Peter; Haifeng Guo; Sally Gustafson; Brooke Heubner; Kenneth Lamb; Shuling Li; Suying Li; Yi Peng; Yang Qiu; Tricia Roberts; Melissa Skeans; Jon Snyder; Craig Solid; Bryn Thompson; Changchun Wang; Eric Weinhandl; David Zaun; Cheryl Arko; Shu-Cheng Chen; Frank Daniels; James Ebben; Eric Frazier; Christopher Hanzlik; Roger Johnson; Daniel Sheets; Xinyue Wang; Beth Forrest; Edward Constantini; Susan Everson; Paul Eggers; Lawrence Agodoa Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Ryan J Bamforth; Alain Beaudry; Thomas W Ferguson; Claudio Rigatto; Navdeep Tangri; Clara Bohm; Paul Komenda Journal: Kidney Med Date: 2021-07-07