Literature DB >> 12198219

Patient-related and centre-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in The Netherlands.

Roel M Huisman1, Martin G M Nieuwenhuizen, Frank Th de Charro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although technique failure occurs relatively frequently in peritoneal dialysis (PD), few data have been published on differences in technique failure between centres.
METHODS: Using data from RENINE, the comprehensive dialysis registry of The Netherlands, we analysed PD technique failure rates in the period 1994-1999, with life table methods and Cox multiple regression analysis. Patient age, sex, and the presence or absence of diabetes were included in the analysis, as well as time of initiation of PD and the following centre characteristics: number of PD patients treated in the centre and percentage of patients on PD.
RESULTS: Technique failure was higher in older patients: 2-year technique survival was 75% in those younger than 45 years, 68% in the group aged 45-64 years, and 60% in those over 64 years (P<0.0001). Sex and diabetes made no difference in technique survival. Mean annual technique failure rates varied greatly between centres (10-59%) and correlated with the number of patients on PD in the centre (r=-0.396, P=0.009) and with the fraction of patients on PD (r=-0.410, P=0.006). Low technique survival rates occurred mainly in centres with less than 20 patients on PD: relative risk for technique failure 1.68 as compared with larger centres. Patients starting PD in the period 1997-1999 had better technique survival than those starting in 1994-1996 (P=0.001).
CONCLUSION: PD technique survival in The Netherlands has increased in recent years. Having less than 20 PD patients in a centre or having a small fraction of patients on PD carries an increased risk of technique failure. The variability in PD technique survival between centres indicates that in many centres further improvements should be possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12198219     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/17.9.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  39 in total

1.  Multicenter Registry Analysis of Center Characteristics Associated with Technique Failure in Patients on Incident Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Htay Htay; Yeoungjee Cho; Elaine M Pascoe; Darsy Darssan; Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette; Carmel Hawley; Philip A Clayton; Monique Borlace; Sunil V Badve; Kamal Sud; Neil Boudville; Stephen P McDonald; David W Johnson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis: a story of believers and nonbelievers.

Authors:  Norbert Lameire; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Temporal Trends and Factors Associated with Home Hemodialysis Technique Survival in Canada.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Yingbo Na; Karthik K Tennankore; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Impact of break-in period on the short-term outcomes of patients started on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Yaorong Liu; Lin Zhang; Aiwu Lin; Zhaohui Ni; Jiaqi Qian; Wei Fang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Recent analysis of status and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in the Tokai area of Japan: the second report of the Tokai peritoneal dialysis registry.

Authors:  Masashi Mizuno; Yasuhiko Ito; Yasuhiro Suzuki; Fumiko Sakata; Yosuke Saka; Takeyuki Hiramatsu; Hirofumi Tamai; Makoto Mizutani; Tomohiko Naruse; Norimi Ohashi; Hirotake Kasuga; Hideaki Shimizu; Hisashi Kurata; Kei Kurata; Satoshi Suzuki; Satoko Kido; Yoshikazu Tsuruta; Teppei Matsuoka; Masanobu Horie; Shoichi Maruyama; Seiichi Matsuo
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Catheter Insertion and Perioperative Practices Within the ISPD North American Research Consortium.

Authors:  Eric L Wallace; Rachel B Fissell; Thomas A Golper; Peter G Blake; Adriane M Lewin; Matthew J Oliver; Rob R Quinn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  The Association of Effluent Ca125 with Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Failure.

Authors:  Deirisa Lopes Barreto; Tiny Hoekstra; Nynke Halbesma; Martijn Leegte; Elisabeth W Boeschoten; Friedo W Dekker; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Propensity scores in the presence of effect modification: A case study using the comparison of mortality on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ylian S Liem; John B Wong; Mg Myriam Hunink; Frank Th de Charro; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-11

10.  Timing, causes, predictors and prognosis of switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bernard G Jaar; Laura C Plantinga; Deidra C Crews; Nancy E Fink; Nasser Hebah; Josef Coresh; Alan S Kliger; Neil R Powe
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.