Literature DB >> 14694175

Frequency of patient-physician contact and patient outcomes in hemodialysis care.

Laura C Plantinga1, Nancy E Fink, John H Sadler, Andrew S Levey, Nathan W Levin, Haya R Rubin, Josef Coresh, Michael J Klag, Neil R Powe.   

Abstract

There is little evidence supporting the widespread belief that regular patient-physician contact in chronic disease management leads to better patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship of the frequency of patient-physician contact with several patient outcomes in a prospective cohort study begun in 1995 of incident hemodialysis patients treated at 75 US dialysis clinics. Average frequency of patient-physician contact at each clinic was determined by clinic survey (low, monthly or less frequent; intermediate, between monthly and weekly; high, more than weekly). The authors used logistic, Poisson, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to assess the relationship between contact and satisfaction, quality of life, patient adherence, hospitalizations, and mortality. Of 735 hemodialysis patients, 14.3% were treated at clinics with high frequency of contact, 65.2% intermediate, and 20.5% low. Patients treated at clinics reporting less frequent physician contact had lower odds of rating the frequency at which they saw a nephrologist excellent (low: adjusted OR = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.23-0.67; intermediate: adjusted OR = 0.57, 95% CI, 0.37-0.87; reference, high) and greater odds of nonadherence (low: adjusted OR = 2.89, 95% CI, 1.01-8.29; intermediate: adjusted OR = 1.58, 95% CI, 0.78-3.19). However, patient survival did not vary by frequency of physician contact (low: adjusted RH = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.53-1.44; intermediate: adjusted RH = 1.33, 95% CI, 0.82-2.13), nor did patients' overall ratings of care, hospitalization rates, or quality of life measures. Although less frequent patient-physician contact was associated with lower patient satisfaction with that contact and patient nonadherence, it was not associated with several other outcomes of care. Future studies are needed to assess the individual frequency and nature of physician contact over time, including total time spent with the patient and quality of the interaction, to guide the provision of patient-centered and cost-effective care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14694175     DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000106101.48237.9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  23 in total

1.  Variation in nephrologist visits to patients on hemodialysis across dialysis facilities and geographic locations.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Kelvin B Tan; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Evaluating the Evidence behind Policy Mandates in US Dialysis Care.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Hemodialysis Hospitalizations and Readmissions: The Effects of Payment Reform.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  A View of the Bundle from a Home Dialysis Perspective: Present at the Creation.

Authors:  Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Medicare Reimbursement Reform for Provider Visits and Health Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kevin F Erickson; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Glenn M Chertow; Jay Bhattacharya
Journal:  Forum Health Econ Policy       Date:  2014-01-01

6.  Associations of frequency and duration of patient-doctor contact in hemodialysis facilities with mortality.

Authors:  Takehiko Kawaguchi; Angelo Karaboyas; Bruce M Robinson; Yun Li; Shunichi Fukuhara; Brian A Bieber; Hugh C Rayner; Vittorio E Andreucci; Ronald L Pisoni; Friedrich K Port; Hal Morgenstern; Tadao Akizawa; Rajiv Saran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 7.  Measuring patient experience in dialysis: a new paradigm of quality assessment.

Authors:  Connie M Rhee; Steven M Brunelli; Lalita Subramanian; Francesca Tentori
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.902

8.  Association of peritoneal dialysis clinic size with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Fredric O Finkelstein; Neil R Powe; Bernard G Jaar
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Predictors of provider-patient visit frequency during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Yelena Slinin; Haifeng Guo; Suying Li; Jiannong Liu; Benjamin Morgan; Kristine Ensrud; David T Gilbertson; Allan J Collins; Areef Ishani
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Exploring the association between macroeconomic indicators and dialysis mortality.

Authors:  Anneke Kramer; Vianda S Stel; Fergus J Caskey; Benedicte Stengel; Robert F Elliott; Adrian Covic; Claudia Geue; Ana Cusumano; Alison M Macleod; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.