Literature DB >> 11840373

Comorbidity and other factors associated with modality selection in incident dialysis patients: the CHOICE Study. Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease.

Dana C Miskulin1, Klemens B Meyer, Nicolaos V Athienites, Alice A Martin, Norma Terrin, Jane V Marsh, Nancy E Fink, Josef Coresh, Neil R Powe, Mike J Klag, Andrew S Levey.   

Abstract

Case-mix factors influence both the selection of dialysis modality and outcomes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A detailed characterization of the case-mix differences between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients at the onset of dialysis therapy has not been performed, despite the importance of accounting for baseline differences in future comparisons of outcomes across modality groups. We compared baseline characteristics of 279 PD and 759 HD patients enrolled in the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) Cohort Study, a prospective study of incident dialysis patients. Comorbidity was assessed using the Index of Coexistent Diseases (ICED), consisting of a medical record review of 19 medical conditions and an observer-based assessment of 11 physical functions. ICED scores range from 0 to 3, with higher levels reflecting more severe comorbidity. Comorbidity was less severe in PD patients than in HD patients: the proportions of patients with ICED 0-1, ICED 2, and ICED 3 were 52%, 26%, and 22%, respectively, among the PD patients and 30%, 39%, and 31%, respectively, among the HD patients (P < 0.001). After controlling for all other factors, the differences in comorbidity remained significant. As compared with patients with ICED 0-1, the odds of being treated with PD for patients with ICED 2 and ICED 3 were less (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence intervals) 0.31 (0.17 to 0.56) and 0.50 (0.28 to 0.90), respectively. The number and severity of comorbid conditions at the onset of ESRD is significantly lower in patients choosing PD, independent of other factors influencing modality selection. The increased survival of PD patients reported in recent studies may simply reflect the self- or physician-directed selection of healthier patients to PD. Adjustment for case-mix differences in patients treated with PD versus HD is essential to the assessment of the independent effect of the dialysis modality on outcomes. Copyright 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11840373     DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.30552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  50 in total

1.  Inflammation and the paradox of racial differences in dialysis survival.

Authors:  Deidra C Crews; Stephen M Sozio; Yongmei Liu; Josef Coresh; Neil R Powe
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Selecting Peritoneal Dialysis in the Older Dialysis Population.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Robert R Quinn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Survival by Dialysis Modality-Who Cares?

Authors:  Martin B Lee; Joanne M Bargman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Meta-analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of infection in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Ioannis M Zacharioudakis; Fainareti N Zervou; Panayiotis D Ziakas; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 5.  Dialysis or not in the very elderly ESRD patient.

Authors:  Mihaela Busuioc; Paul Gusbeth-Tatomir; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Payment Reform and Health Disparities: Changes in Dialysis Modality under the New Medicare Dialysis Payment System.

Authors:  Marc Turenne; Regina Baker; Jeffrey Pearson; Chad Cogan; Purna Mukhopadhyay; Elizabeth Cope
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Phosphate levels and blood pressure in incident hemodialysis patients: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Cindy Xin Huang; Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Michal L Melamed; Josef Coresh; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.620

8.  Serum phosphate levels and risk of infection in incident dialysis patients.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Michal L Melamed; William A Briggs; Neil R Powe; Bernard G Jaar
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Differences in initial treatment modality for end-stage renal disease among glomerulonephritis subtypes in the USA.

Authors:  Michelle M O'Shaughnessy; Maria E Montez-Rath; Richard A Lafayette; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Timing, causes, predictors and prognosis of switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bernard G Jaar; Laura C Plantinga; Deidra C Crews; Nancy E Fink; Nasser Hebah; Josef Coresh; Alan S Kliger; Neil R Powe
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.