OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy among men in the Western world. Imaging has recently become more important in the diagnosis, local staging, and treatment follow-up of prostate cancer. In this article, we review conventional and functional imaging methods as well as targeted imaging approaches with novel tracers used in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Although prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men, imaging of localized prostate cancer remains limited. Recent developments in imaging technologies, particularly MRI and PET, may lead to significant improvements in lesion detection and staging.
OBJECTIVE:Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy among men in the Western world. Imaging has recently become more important in the diagnosis, local staging, and treatment follow-up of prostate cancer. In this article, we review conventional and functional imaging methods as well as targeted imaging approaches with novel tracers used in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Although prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men, imaging of localized prostate cancer remains limited. Recent developments in imaging technologies, particularly MRI and PET, may lead to significant improvements in lesion detection and staging.
Authors: H P Beerlage; R G Aarnink; E Th Ruijter; J A Witjes; H Wijkstra; C A Van De Kaa; F M J Debruyne; J J M C H De La Rosette Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2001 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: David M Schuster; John R Votaw; Peter T Nieh; Weiping Yu; Jonathon A Nye; Viraj Master; F DuBois Bowman; Muta M Issa; Mark M Goodman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: K K Yu; J Scheidler; H Hricak; D B Vigneron; C J Zaloudek; R G Males; S J Nelson; P R Carroll; J Kurhanewicz Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M J Manyak; G H Hinkle; J O Olsen; R P Chiaccherini; A W Partin; S Piantadosi; J K Burgers; J H Texter; C E Neal; J A Libertino; G L Wright; R T Maguire Journal: Urology Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: S D Yeh; M Imbriaco; S M Larson; D Garza; J J Zhang; H Kalaigian; R D Finn; D Reddy; S M Horowitz; S J Goldsmith; H I Scher Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Tim Joseph; David A McKenna; Antonio C Westphalen; Fergus V Coakley; Shoujun Zhao; Ying Lu; I-Chow Hsu; Mack Roach; John Kurhanewicz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Herb Singh; Eduardo I Canto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Dov Kadmon; Brian J Miles; Thomas M Wheeler; Kevin M Slawin Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin K Yerram; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto Journal: Curr Opin Urol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.309
Authors: Luca F Valle; Matthew D Greer; Joanna H Shih; Tristan Barrett; Yan Mee Law; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Haytham Shebel; Akhil Muthigi; Daniel Su; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Andra V Krauze; Aradhana Kaushal; Peter L Choyke; Barış Türkbey; Deborah E Citrin Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: C Buerger; J Sénégas; S Kabus; H Carolus; H Schulz; H Agarwal; B Turkbey; P L Choyke; S Renisch Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Vijay Shah; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Yuxi Pang; Dagane Daar; Compton Benjamin; Yolanda L McKinney; Hari Trivedi; Celene Chua; Gennady Bratslavsky; Joanna H Shih; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 3.959