Literature DB >> 8940712

Detection of bony metastases of androgen-independent prostate cancer by PET-FDG.

S D Yeh1, M Imbriaco, S M Larson, D Garza, J J Zhang, H Kalaigian, R D Finn, D Reddy, S M Horowitz, S J Goldsmith, H I Scher.   

Abstract

Fourteen F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) studies were carried out in 13 patients known to have bony metastases from carcinoma of the prostate. One patient was newly diagnosed. The remaining patients had various types of therapy and were considered hormonally resistant. The average age was 67. All patients had extensive bony metastases shown on the conventional Tc99m-MDP bone scans. Only about 18% of bony lesions apparent on the conventional bone scans showed corresponding increase of FDG uptake. Anatomical correlation was performed by using co-registered images of SPECT and PET in the same area. The positive FDG uptake was not related to the duration of illness, level of PSA, previous therapy, and magnitude of disease involvement. It appears that only a small percentage of bony metastases is associated with increased glycolysis. It is possible that other metabolic processes are more important than glycolysis for providing prostate cancer with a source of energy and nutrients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8940712     DOI: 10.1016/0969-8051(96)00044-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Biol        ISSN: 0969-8051            Impact factor:   2.408


  25 in total

1.  FDG PET in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-04-01

Review 2.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Osteoblastic bone metastases in breast cancer: is not seeing believing?

Authors:  Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  FDG-PET and CT patterns of bone metastases and their relationship to previously administered anti-cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ora Israel; Anat Goldberg; Alicia Nachtigal; Daniela Militianu; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Zohar Keidar; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prognostic value of baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in progressing metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gustavo S P Meirelles; Heiko Schöder; Gregory C Ravizzini; Mithat Gönen; Josef J Fox; John Humm; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Advances in Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Staging and Radiotherapy Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Drew Moghanaki; Baris Turkbey; Neha Vapiwala; Behfar Ehdaie; Steven J Frank; Patrick W McLaughlin; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 9.  Validation and clinical utility of prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Steven Larson; Glenn Heller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  PET and PET/CT imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.