Literature DB >> 23483268

[Imaging diagnostics of advanced prostate cancer].

A Kretschmer1, M Seitz, A Graser, C G Stief, D Tilki.   

Abstract

The diagnostic approach to prostate cancer is still a big challenge for the treating physician. Regarding an individualized and risk-adapted evaluation of different therapeutic options, precise diagnostic tools are crucial to accurately distinguish between localized and advanced prostate cancer. Imaging of advanced prostate cancer is currently changing due to numerous technical innovations. While choline-based hybrid positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) has been established as an important diagnostic tool in clinical imaging of advanced prostate cancer, well-investigated methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy are currently expanding the diagnostic potential due to technical improvements. The specific use of imaging for advanced prostate cancer may help to offer the patient a well-tailored oncologic therapy. Further research is needed to evaluate whether this individualized therapy can consistently improve the prognosis of patients suffering from advanced prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483268     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-3095-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  61 in total

1.  Pretreatment staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

Authors:  E S Amis; L R Bigongiari; E I Bluth; W H Bush; P L Choyke; P Fritzsche; L Holder; J H Newhouse; C M Sandler; A J Segal; M I Resnick; E A Rutsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Preoperative staging of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer by 11C-choline PET.

Authors:  Igle J de Jong; Jan Pruim; Philip H Elsinga; Willem Vaalburg; Han J Mensink
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Dietary choline: biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology.

Authors:  S H Zeisel
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 11.848

4.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C Hofer; C Laubenbacher; T Block; J Breul; R Hartung; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prospective evaluation of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the nodal staging of prostate cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Tom Budiharto; Steven Joniau; Evelyne Lerut; Laura Van den Bergh; Felix Mottaghy; Christophe M Deroose; Raymond Oyen; Filip Ameye; Kris Bogaerts; Karin Haustermans; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of [18F]fluorocholine positron emission tomography-computerized tomography and laparoscopic radioisotope guided sentinel lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Axel Häcker; Stefan Jeschke; Karl Leeb; Kurt Prammer; Josef Ziegerhofer; Wolfgang Sega; Werner Langsteger; Guenter Janetschek
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Evaluation of [11C]-choline positron-emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ludwig Rinnab; Felix M Mottaghy; Norbert M Blumstein; Sven N Reske; Richard E Hautmann; Kathrin Hohl; Peter Möller; Thomas Wiegel; Rainer Kuefer; Juergen E Gschwend
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  The flare phenomenon on radionuclide bone scan in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  J J Pollen; K F Witztum; W L Ashburn
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Non-invasive molecular imaging of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Frédéric Pouliot; Mai Johnson; Lily Wu
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 10.  Imaging metastatic bone disease from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Messiou; G Cook; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Sub-threshold prostate-specific antigen levels after resection of metachronous pulmonary metastases].

Authors:  A Spek; C Faber; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.