Literature DB >> 19449348

How oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer communicate about health-related quality of life.

Keri L Rodriguez1, Nichole Bayliss, Stewart C Alexander, Amy S Jeffreys, Maren K Olsen, Kathryn I Pollak, Sarah L Kennifer, James A Tulsky, Robert M Arnold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the content and frequency of communication about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during outpatient encounters between oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer.
METHODS: We coded for HRQOL talk in a subset of audio-recorded conversations (each previously found to contain prognostic talk by the oncologist) from the Study of Communication in Oncologist-Patient Encounters Trial, a randomized controlled trial conducted from 2003 to 2008 in two large US academic medical centers and one Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
RESULTS: Seventy-three encounters involved 70 patients and 37 oncologists. Patients were more likely to be female (53%), White (86%), married (78%), and possessing some college education (62%). Most oncologists were male (78%) and White (78%). Mean ages were 59 years for patients and 44 years for oncologists. Every encounter included some talk about HRQOL and HRQOL discussions made up, on average, 25% of the visit time. HRQOL segments described symptoms (50%), general HRQOL (27%), and the following concerns: physical (27%), functional (22%), psychological (9%), social (7%), spiritual (1%), and other (28%). Topics included treatment (56%), disease (14%), and testing (3%), and conversations focused on past (44%), present (68%), and future HRQOL (59%).
CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL discussions between oncologists and patients are common, but the emphasis is often on treatment (e.g. side effects) and symptoms (e.g. pain) even in patients with advanced disease. Given the often intense emotional experience of patients with advanced cancer, oncologists may need to pay more attention to psychological, social, and spiritual HRQOL concerns. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19449348      PMCID: PMC3090079          DOI: 10.1002/pon.1579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  31 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life assessed before and during chemotherapy predicts for survival in multiple myeloma. Nordic Myeloma Study Group.

Authors:  F Wisløff; M Hjorth
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 2.  Quality of life in persons with non-small cell lung cancer: a concept analysis.

Authors:  M E Cooley
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Terminally ill cancer patients. Their most important concerns.

Authors:  A J Greisinger; R J Lorimor; L A Aday; R J Winn; W F Baile
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1997 May-Jun

5.  Studying communication in oncologist-patient encounters: the SCOPE Trial.

Authors:  Celine M Koropchak; Kathryn I Pollak; Robert M Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Celette Sugg Skinner; Maren K Olsen; Amy S Jeffreys; Keri L Rodriguez; Amy P Abernethy; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 6.  Definition and measurement of quality of life in oncology nursing research: review and theoretical implications.

Authors:  M E Mast
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Quality of life scores: an independent prognostic variable in a general population of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  J Dancey; B Zee; D Osoba; M Whitehead; F Lu; L Kaizer; J Latreille; J L Pater
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Measuring quality of life in palliative care.

Authors:  D F Cella
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Physicians' and medical students' perspectives on patients' quality of life.

Authors:  T Tanaka; C C Gotay
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Exploring information-exchange in consultation: the patients' view of performance and outcomes.

Authors:  L G Frederikson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1995-07
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].

Authors:  Lisa M Wintner; Johannes M Giesinger; Georg Kemmler; Monika Sztankay; Anne Oberguggenberger; Eva-Maria Gamper; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Margaret Bevans
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2010

3.  Effect of patient and patient-oncologist relationship characteristics on communication about health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Keri L Rodriguez; Nichole K Bayliss; Stewart C Alexander; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Kathryn I Pollak; Sarah K Garrigues; James A Tulsky; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Distress screening in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) caregivers and patients.

Authors:  Margaret Bevans; Leslie Wehrlen; Olena Prachenko; Karen Soeken; James Zabora; Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Directly observed patient-physician discussions in palliative and end-of-life care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Elizabeth Fine; M Carrington Reid; Rouzi Shengelia; Ronald D Adelman
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  How does patient-clinician information engagement influence self-reported cancer-related problems?: findings from a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Angel Bourgoin; Stacy W Gray; Katrina Armstrong; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  SEOM/SERAM consensus statement on radiological diagnosis, response assessment and follow-up in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R García-Carbonero; R Vera; F Rivera; E Parlorio; M Pagés; E González-Flores; C Fernández-Martos; M Á Corral; R Bouzas; F Matute
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Patient-physician communication about health-related quality-of-life problems: are non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors willing to talk?

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora; Roxanne E Jensen; Nadiyah Sulayman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Anna P B M Braeken; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Daniëlle Eekers; Francis C J M van Gils; Ruud M A Houben; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.

Authors:  Philippa M Moore; Solange Rivera; Gonzalo A Bravo-Soto; Camila Olivares; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.