Literature DB >> 17148536

Studying communication in oncologist-patient encounters: the SCOPE Trial.

Celine M Koropchak1, Kathryn I Pollak, Robert M Arnold, Stewart C Alexander, Celette Sugg Skinner, Maren K Olsen, Amy S Jeffreys, Keri L Rodriguez, Amy P Abernethy, James A Tulsky.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Most oncologists have not received adequate training in physician-patient communication, and existing effective courses tend to be time and resource intensive. We are developing and testing a tailored CD-ROM educational intervention that includes feedback on oncologists' own audio-recorded conversations with their advanced cancer patients. In this report, we describe the study methods and identify challenges to implementation and how these were overcome. STUDY
DESIGN: A three-phase, randomized, controlled trial. In Phase 1, we audio-recorded oncologist-patient clinic encounters. In Phase 2, oncologists were randomly assigned to a communication CD-ROM intervention or control. Phase 3 consisted of audio-recording all participating oncologists conversing with a new sample of patients, two to 12 months after the intervention, to assess its effectiveness.
SETTING: Oncology clinics at Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (DVAMC) in Durham, NC, and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) in Pittsburgh, PA. PARTICIPANTS: Medical, radiation and gynecological oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer. INTERVENTION: A tailored CD-ROM that contains an interactive educational interface with reference materials and video-clips of model conversations, along with the oncologists' own Phase 1 audio-recorded conversations.
CONCLUSION: We present challenges and solutions to oncologist recruitment, identifying appropriate patients with advanced cancer, adapting to clinic flow, and developing a self-administered communications intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148536     DOI: 10.1177/0269216306070657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  29 in total

1.  Enhancing communication between oncologists and patients with a computer-based training program: a randomized trial.

Authors:  James A Tulsky; Robert M Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Maren K Olsen; Amy S Jeffreys; Keri L Rodriguez; Celette Sugg Skinner; David Farrell; Amy P Abernethy; Kathryn I Pollak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Seriously ill hospitalized patients' perspectives on the benefits and harms of two models of hospital CPR discussions.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Jenica W Cimino; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

3.  Studying physician-patient communication in the acute care setting: the hospitalist rapport study.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Kathryn Winters; Robert M Arnold; Kathleen A Puntillo; Douglas B White; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-05-04

4.  The Surprise Question and Identification of Palliative Care Needs among Hospitalized Patients with Advanced Hematologic or Solid Malignancies.

Authors:  Kathryn Elizabeth Hudson; Steven Paul Wolf; Gregory P Samsa; Arif H Kamal; Amy Pickar Abernethy; Thomas William LeBlanc
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 5.  Closing the patient-oncologist communication gap: a review of historic and current efforts.

Authors:  A Khoa Pham; Marianne T Bauer; Stefan Balan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Advancing the field of communication research in pediatric oncology: A systematic review of the literature analyzing medical dialogue.

Authors:  Erica C Kaye; Ashley Kiefer; Kristina Zalud; Melanie Gattas; Ian Snyder; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  How oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer communicate about health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Keri L Rodriguez; Nichole Bayliss; Stewart C Alexander; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Kathryn I Pollak; Sarah L Kennifer; James A Tulsky; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Do patient attributes predict oncologist empathic responses and patient perceptions of empathy?

Authors:  Kathryn I Pollak; Robert Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Amy P Abernethy; Keri L Rodriguez; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Negative emotions in cancer care: do oncologists' responses depend on severity and type of emotion?

Authors:  Sarah L Kennifer; Stewart C Alexander; Kathryn I Pollak; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Keri L Rodriguez; Robert M Arnold; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11-28

10.  Can metaphors and analogies improve communication with seriously ill patients?

Authors:  David Casarett; Amy Pickard; Jessica M Fishman; Stewart C Alexander; Robert M Arnold; Kathryn I Pollak; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.