Literature DB >> 22538839

[The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].

Lisa M Wintner1, Johannes M Giesinger, Georg Kemmler, Monika Sztankay, Anne Oberguggenberger, Eva-Maria Gamper, Barbara Sperner-Unterweger, Bernhard Holzner.   

Abstract

The patient's perspective evaluated by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) gains more and more importance, since treatment efficacy is no longer solely linked to clinical outcomes like cure and overall survival. Ailments like pain, fatigue and social isolation can only be assessed by patients' direct expression without any interpretation made by medical staff. PROs facilitate the disclosure of quality of life issues and patients feel a stronger support due to improved communication. PROs offer many further advantages like saving of time, cost and staff, targeted intervention and sensitizing of clinicians. Also, internationally validated questionnaires are available and the development of electronic PROs eases data-collection, calculation and storage. PROs collected within clinical routine are versatile concerning their applicability: They can be used for scientific analyses, quality assurance, and health technology assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538839     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-012-0168-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  50 in total

1.  A comparison of patient and proxy symptom assessments in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  C L Nekolaichuk; E Bruera; K Spachynski; T MacEachern; J Hanson; T O Maguire
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  [Quality of life: attitudes and perspectives of doctors in a thoracic oncology regional care network].

Authors:  F Barlési; C Tchouhadjian; C Doddoli; Ph Astoul; P Thomas; P Auquier
Journal:  Sante Publique       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.203

3.  Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: evaluating and enhancing the payoff to decision making.

Authors:  Steven B Clauser; Patricia A Ganz; Joseph Lipscomb; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Quality-of-Life assessment for routine oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Michele Y Halyard; Carol Estwing Ferrans
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2008 May-Jun

5.  The use of quality of life data in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Morris; D Perez; B McNoe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain.

Authors:  S A Grossman; V R Sheidler; K Swedeen; J Mucenski; S Piantadosi
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Implementation of computer-based quality-of-life monitoring in brain tumor outpatients in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Astrid Erharter; Johannes Giesinger; Georg Kemmler; Gabriele Schauer-Maurer; Guenter Stockhammer; Armin Muigg; Markus Hutterer; Gerhard Rumpold; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians.

Authors:  K A Wilson; A J Dowling; M Abdolell; I F Tannock
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Self-monitoring in inflammatory rheumatic diseases].

Authors:  C Kampling; G Chehab; M Schneider; J G Richter
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Chronic Condition Measurement Requires Engagement, Not Measurement Alone.

Authors:  Andrea M Austin; Don Carmichael; Scott Berry; Wendolyn S Gozansky; Eugene C Nelson; Jonathan S Skinner; Paul J Barr
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2019 Oct/Dec

3.  Willingness of Patients with Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant and Metastatic Setting to Use Electronic Surveys (ePRO) Depends on Sociodemographic Factors, Health-related Quality of Life, Disease Status and Computer Skills.

Authors:  J Graf; E Simoes; K Wißlicen; L Rava; C B Walter; A Hartkopf; L Keilmann; A Taran; S Wallwiener; P Fasching; S Y Brucker; M Wallwiener
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement for Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Sean Douglas; Austin Lutz; Kevin T McVary; Puneet Masson; Jack Christian Winters; Eric Laborde
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

5.  Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home.

Authors:  L M Wintner; J M Giesinger; A Zabernigg; G Rumpold; M Sztankay; A S Oberguggenberger; E M Gamper; B Holzner
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting.

Authors:  Joshua Biber; Dominik Ose; Jenny Reese; Anna Gardiner; Julio Facelli; Joshua Spuhl; Darrel Brodke; Vivian S Lee; Rachel Hess; Howard Weeks
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-08-17

7.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) in the Polish population.

Authors:  Maciej Kupczyk; Ilaria Baiardini; Giorgia Molinengo; Barbara Loera; Dorota Szydłowska; Piotr Kuna; Giorgio Walter Canonica; Fulvio Braido
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol.

Authors:  Mirja Gianna Görlach; Theresa Schrage; Carsten Bokemeyer; Nicolaus Kröger; Volkmar Müller; Cordula Petersen; Christian Stephan Betz; Andreas Krüll; Holger Schulz; Christiane Bleich
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Evaluation by electronic patient-reported outcomes of cancer survivors' needs and the efficacy of inpatient cancer rehabilitation in different tumor entities.

Authors:  Thomas Licht; Alain Nickels; Gerhard Rumpold; Bernhard Holzner; David Riedl
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.603

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.