Literature DB >> 19446942

Patient satisfaction revisited: a multilevel approach.

Karin Dorieke Hekkert1, Sezgin Cihangir, Sophia Martine Kleefstra, Bernard van den Berg, Rudolf Bertijn Kool.   

Abstract

Patient satisfaction surveys are increasingly used for benchmarking purposes. In the Netherlands, the results of these surveys are reported at the univariate level without taking case mix factors into account. The first objective of the present study was to determine whether differences in patient satisfaction are attributed to the hospital, department or patient characteristics. Our second aim was to investigate which case mix variables could be taken into account when satisfaction surveys are carried out for benchmarking purposes. Patients who either were discharged from eight academic and fourteen general Dutch hospitals or visited the outpatient departments of the same hospitals in 2005 participated in cross-sectional satisfaction surveys. Satisfaction was measured on six dimensions of care and one general dimension. We used multilevel analysis to estimate the proportion of variance in satisfaction scores determined by the hospital and department levels by calculating intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Hospital size, hospital type, population density and response rate are four case mix variables we investigated at the hospital level. We also measured the effects of patient characteristics (gender, age, education, health status, and mother language) on satisfaction. We found ICCs on hospital and department levels ranging from 0% to 4% for all dimensions. This means that only a minor part of the variance in patient satisfaction scores is attributed to the hospital and department levels. Although all patient characteristics had some statistically significant influence on patient satisfaction, age, health status and education appeared to be the most important determinants of patient satisfaction and could be considered for case mix correction. Gender, mother language, hospital type, hospital size, population density and response rate seemed to be less important determinants. The explained variance of the patient and hospital characteristics ranged from 3% to 5% for the different dimensions. Our conclusions are, first, that a substantial part of the variance is on the patient level, while only a minor part of the variance is at the hospital and department levels. Second, patient satisfaction outcomes in the Netherlands can be corrected by the case mix variables age, health status and education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446942     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  65 in total

1.  Clinical results of and patient satisfaction with cervical laminoplasty for considerable cord compression with only slight myelopathy.

Authors:  Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores after spine surgery.

Authors:  A M Abtahi; D S Brodke; B D Lawrence; C Zhang; W R Spiker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The System for Patient Assessment of Cancer Experiences (SPACE): a cross-sectional study examining feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Rob W Sanson-Fisher; Breanne T Hobden; Mariko L Carey; Heidi E Turon; Amy E Waller; Anthony M Proietto
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Health Care Satisfaction: Effects of Immigration, Acculturation, Language.

Authors:  Russell K Schutt; Camila Mejía
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-12

5.  Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Schwarzkopf; Susanne Behrend; Helga Skupin; Isabella Westermann; Niels C Riedemann; Rüdiger Pfeifer; Albrecht Günther; Otto W Witte; Konrad Reinhart; Christiane S Hartog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Association Between Orthopaedic Outpatient Satisfaction and Non-Modifiable Patient Factors.

Authors:  Amir M Abtahi; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew R Tyser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Patient satisfaction with breast cancer follow-up care provided by family physicians.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Yihang Liu; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  Physician burnout and patient satisfaction with consultation in primary health care settings: evidence of relationships from a one-with-many design.

Authors:  Fotios Anagnostopoulos; Evangelos Liolios; George Persefonis; Julie Slater; Kostas Kafetsios; Dimitris Niakas
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2012-12

9.  Patients' experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Marc Wallace; Alan A Montgomery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-12

10.  "Tendency to excuse" and patient satisfaction of those suffering with breast cancer.

Authors:  Sabine Davoll; Christoph Kowalski; Kathrin Kuhr; Oliver Ommen; Nicole Ernstmann; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.