Literature DB >> 25995493

Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores after spine surgery.

A M Abtahi1, D S Brodke1, B D Lawrence1, C Zhang2, W R Spiker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction has become an important component of the delivery of health care in the United States. Previous studies have shown that patient satisfaction is influenced by patient-specific characteristics. The goal of this study was to determine whether psychological distress influences outpatient satisfaction scores following spine surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records from all outpatient clinical encounters at a single academic spine surgery center between February 2011 and January 2013. Any patient who completed both a patient satisfaction survey and a Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) questionnaire for the same clinical encounter was included in the study. Statistical analysis was performed to determine whether patient satisfaction scores were influenced by psychological distress.
RESULTS: During the study period, 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. On the basis of their responses to the DRAM questionnaire, fifty-six were classified as normal (no evidence of distress), twenty-two as at risk, thirteen as distressed depressive, and twelve as distressed somatic. The mean overall patient satisfaction scores (and standard deviation) were 90.2 ± 10.9 in the normal group, 94.7 ± 8.2 in the at-risk group, 87.5 ± 16.2 in the distressed-depressive group, and 75.7 ± 22.4 in the distressed-somatic group (p = 0.003). The mean score for the patients' satisfaction with their provider was 94.2 ± 12.0 in the normal group, 94.2 ± 9.5 in the at-risk group, 90.6 ± 24.0 in the distressed-depressive group, and 74.9 ± 26.2 in the distressed-somatic group (p = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate a significant association between patient satisfaction and psychological distress as measured with the DRAM questionnaire. "Distressed" patients gave significantly lower scores for overall satisfaction and satisfaction with their provider compared with patients categorized as "normal." These results suggest that psychological factors may influence patients' perception of the medical care provided to them.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25995493      PMCID: PMC4430100          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  32 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction in relation to age, health status and other background factors: a model for comparisons of care units.

Authors:  M Rahmqvist
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Phi Linh Nguyen Thi; S Briançon; F Empereur; F Guillemin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Predictors of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J L Jackson; J Chamberlin; K Kroenke
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Clinical predictors of psychological distress in patients presenting for evaluation of a spinal disorder.

Authors:  Michael D Daubs; Man Hung; Jacob R Adams; Alpesh A Patel; Brandon D Lawrence; Ashley M Neese; Darrel S Brodke
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Patient satisfaction with hospital care: effects of demographic and institutional characteristics.

Authors:  G J Young; M Meterko; K R Desai
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care.

Authors:  B C Sun; J Adams; E J Orav; D W Rucker; T A Brennan; H R Burstin
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Determinants of patient satisfaction in a large, municipal ED: the role of demographic variables, visit characteristics, and patient perceptions.

Authors:  E D Boudreaux; R D Ary; C V Mandry; B McCabe
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients?

Authors:  C Komal Jaipaul; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Psychologic distress reduces preoperative self-assessment scores in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Grant S Sun; James T Beckmann; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Studies of the Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire (MSPQ) in patients with back pain. Psychometric and predictive properties.

Authors:  R A Deyo; N E Walsh; L S Schoenfeld; S Ramamurthy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Editorial-Measuring Satisfaction: Can It Be Done?

Authors:  David Ring; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Depression and Non-modifiable Patient Factors Associated with Patient Satisfaction in an Academic Orthopaedic Outpatient Clinic: Is it More Than a Provider Issue?

Authors:  Breann K Tisano; Paul A Nakonezny; Bruno S Gross; J Riley Martinez; Joel E Wells
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  What's New in Orthopaedic Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; John E Kuhn; William D Murrell; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Circumferential fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by distal junctional grade 4 spondylolisthesis in the sub-acute post-operative setting" by Alexander A. Theologis et al. (Eur Spine J; 2017. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-4976-z).

Authors:  Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Circumferential fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis complicated by distal junctional grade 4 spondylolisthesis in the sub-acute post-operative setting.

Authors:  Alexander A Theologis; Deeptee Jain; Christopher P Ames; Murat Pekmezci
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Determinants of patient satisfaction after surgery for central spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis: a register study of 5100 patients.

Authors:  Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson; Bo Jönsson; Björn Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Influence of psychosocial distress in the results of elective lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Vivian Amaral; Luis Marchi; Heber Martim; Rodrigo Amaral; Joes Nogueira-Neto; Ellen Pierro; Leonardo Oliveira; Etevaldo Coutinho; Fernando Marcelino; Nicholai Faulhaber; Rubens Jensen; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

8.  Mental Health Associated With Postoperative Satisfaction in Lumbar Degenerative Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Rafa Rahman; Bo Zhang; Nicholas S Andrade; Alvaro Ibaseta; Khaled M Kebaish; Lee H Riley; David B Cohen; Amit Jain; Sang H Lee; Daniel M Sciubba; Richard L Skolasky; Brian J Neuman
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Predictors of Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brandon M Lehrich; Khodayar Goshtasbi; Nolan J Brown; Shane Shahrestani; Brian V Lien; Seth C Ransom; Ali R Tafreshi; Ryan C Ransom; Alvin Y Chan; Luis D Diaz-Aguilar; Ronald Sahyouni; Martin H Pham; Joseph A Osorio; Michael Y Oh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Attitudes Toward Aging Among Patients With Upper Extremity Illness.

Authors:  Thi T H Tran; Joost T P Kortlever; Teun Teunis; David Ring; Gregg A Vagner; Lee M Reichel
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.