Rob W Sanson-Fisher1,2,3, Breanne T Hobden4,5,6, Mariko L Carey1,2,3, Heidi E Turon1,2,3, Amy E Waller1,2,3, Anthony M Proietto1,7. 1. Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. 2. Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. 3. Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia. 4. Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. Breanne.Hobden@newcastle.edu.au. 5. Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Breanne.Hobden@newcastle.edu.au. 6. Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia. Breanne.Hobden@newcastle.edu.au. 7. Cancer Network, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuous quality improvement in cancer care relies on the collection of accurate data on the quality of care provided. It is suggested that such an approach should: (i) measure the patient's care experience throughout the cancer trajectory; (ii) use items and response scales that measure concrete and specific aspects of care; (iii) minimise recall bias; (iv) minimise the burden placed on patients for providing data; (v) minimise administrative burden; and (vi) collect actionable data. The System for Patient Assessment of Cancer Experiences (SPACE) was developed to meet these objectives. This study describes the feasibility and acceptability of the SPACE in a sample of oncology outpatients. METHODS: The SPACE was examined in four medical oncology centres. Adult patients were approached by a research assistant prior to their scheduled consultation. Consenting participants completed the SPACE on a computer tablet. Items were tailored to the patient's cancer treatment phase. RESULTS: Of the eligible participants, 1143 consented (83%) and 1056 completed the survey (92%). The average time taken to complete the survey was 6 min 28 s. A large proportion of the sample indicated that the survey was acceptable (88-93% across three acceptability items). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the SPACE can be feasibly administered each time a patient comes to the oncology unit and is acceptable to patients. The SPACE could be used to quantify the care experiences which patients receive during their cancer care. The resulting data could be used to set benchmarks and improve the performance of cancer clinics.
BACKGROUND: Continuous quality improvement in cancer care relies on the collection of accurate data on the quality of care provided. It is suggested that such an approach should: (i) measure the patient's care experience throughout the cancer trajectory; (ii) use items and response scales that measure concrete and specific aspects of care; (iii) minimise recall bias; (iv) minimise the burden placed on patients for providing data; (v) minimise administrative burden; and (vi) collect actionable data. The System for Patient Assessment of Cancer Experiences (SPACE) was developed to meet these objectives. This study describes the feasibility and acceptability of the SPACE in a sample of oncology outpatients. METHODS: The SPACE was examined in four medical oncology centres. Adult patients were approached by a research assistant prior to their scheduled consultation. Consenting participants completed the SPACE on a computer tablet. Items were tailored to the patient's cancer treatment phase. RESULTS: Of the eligible participants, 1143 consented (83%) and 1056 completed the survey (92%). The average time taken to complete the survey was 6 min 28 s. A large proportion of the sample indicated that the survey was acceptable (88-93% across three acceptability items). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the SPACE can be feasibly administered each time a patient comes to the oncology unit and is acceptable to patients. The SPACE could be used to quantify the care experiences which patients receive during their cancer care. The resulting data could be used to set benchmarks and improve the performance of cancer clinics.
Entities:
Keywords:
Neoplasms; Outpatients; Patient care; Process assessment (health care); Quality of health care
Authors: Heather Spence Laschinger; Linda McGillis Hall; Cheryl Pedersen; Joan Almost Journal: J Nurs Care Qual Date: 2005 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.597
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Karin Dorieke Hekkert; Sezgin Cihangir; Sophia Martine Kleefstra; Bernard van den Berg; Rudolf Bertijn Kool Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jordanka Kirkova; Mellar P Davis; Declan Walsh; Eoin Tiernan; Norma O'Leary; Susan B LeGrand; Ruth L Lagman; K Mitchell Russell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Melanie A Price; Phyllis N Butow; Michael J Solomon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Elizabeth A Fradgley; Christine L Paul; Jamie Bryant; Ian A Roos; Frans A Henskens; David J Paul Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Heidi Turon; Breanne Hobden; Kristy Fakes; Matthew Clapham; Anthony Proietto; Rob Sanson-Fisher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 4.614