Literature DB >> 22086814

Patient satisfaction with breast cancer follow-up care provided by family physicians.

Amardeep Thind1, Yihang Liu, Rose C Maly.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is little evidence to document patient satisfaction with follow-up care provided by family physicians (FPs)/general practitioners (GPs) to breast cancer patients. We aimed to identify determinants of satisfaction with such care in low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 145 women who reported receiving follow-up care from an FP/GP. Women were enrolled in California's Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program and were interviewed by phone 3 years after their breast cancer diagnosis. Cleary and McNeil's model, which states that patient satisfaction is a function of patient characteristics, structure of care, and processes of care, was used to understand the determinants of satisfaction. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors.
RESULTS: Of the patients interviewed, 73.4% reported that they were extremely satisfied with their treatment by the FP/GP. Women who were able to ask their family physicians questions about their breast cancer had six times greater odds of being extremely satisfied compared with women who were not able to ask any questions. Women who scored the FP higher on the ability to explain things in a way she could understand had higher odds of being extremely satisfied compared with women who scored their family physicians lower.
CONCLUSIONS: FPs/GPs providing follow-up care for breast cancer patients should encourage patients to ask questions and must communicate in a way that patients understand. These recommendations are congruent with the characteristics of patient-centered communication for cancer patients enunciated in a recent National Cancer Institute monograph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22086814      PMCID: PMC3242480          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  36 in total

1.  Satisfaction with communication, medical knowledge, and coping style in patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  A Steptoe; I Sutcliffe; B Allen; C Coombes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys.

Authors:  G Cohen; J Forbes; M Garraway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-05

3.  Member ratings of health care provided by 48 physician groups.

Authors:  R D Hays; J A Brown; K L Spritzer; W J Dixon; R H Brook
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-13

4.  Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review.

Authors:  M A Stewart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Patient satisfaction with the general practitioner: a two-level analysis.

Authors:  H J Sixma; P M Spreeuwenberg; M A van der Pasch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts.

Authors:  J Sitzia; N Wood
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Cancer patient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  J H Wiggers; K O Donovan; S Redman; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  H R Rubin; B Gandek; W H Rogers; M Kosinski; C A McHorney; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Disparities in the survivorship experience among Latina survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tinuke O Olagunju; Yihang Liu; Li-Jung Liang; James M Stomber; Jennifer J Griggs; Patricia A Ganz; Amardeep Thind; Rose C Maly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Y Y Kwan; J Croke; T Panzarella; K Ubhi; A Fyles; A Koch; R Dinniwell; W Levin; D McCready; C Chung; F Liu; J L Bender
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Assessing Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Measures for Surveillance of Communication Outcomes.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Kathleen M Mazor; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Patients' preferences for post-treatment breast cancer follow-up in primary care vs. secondary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Carriene Roorda; Geertruida H de Bock; Christian Scholing; Klaas van der Meer; Marjolein Y Berger; Marlieke de Fouw; Annette J Berendsen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  A comparison between Lynch syndrome and sporadic colorectal cancer survivors' satisfaction with their healthcare providers.

Authors:  Allison M Burton-Chase; Wendy M Parker; Katrina M Polivka; Ellen R Gritz; Christopher I Amos; Karen H Lu; Patrick M Lynch; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Y Nancy You; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.