Literature DB >> 22945843

"Tendency to excuse" and patient satisfaction of those suffering with breast cancer.

Sabine Davoll1, Christoph Kowalski, Kathrin Kuhr, Oliver Ommen, Nicole Ernstmann, Holger Pfaff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyse the extent to which breast cancer patients excuse inconveniences that occur during their hospitalisation, and how this "tendency to excuse" affects their satisfaction with the hospital stay.
METHODS: Breast cancer patients undergoing treatment at one of 51 breast centres in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) in 2009 were asked to complete the Cologne Patient Questionnaire-Breast Cancer (CPQ-BC). For the analyses, the "tendency to excuse" scale was subdivided into three groups. Linear regressions were performed to investigate associations between the "tendency to excuse" and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: 88 % (3,950) of the patients completed the questionnaire. The results show that the inpatients excused inconsistencies to a moderate degree. The "excusers" and "non-excusers" showed greater satisfaction with hospital services than the "medium-excusers".
CONCLUSIONS: The "tendency to excuse" scale could aid future data analysis of patient satisfaction surveys by identifying patients who are more likely to answer in an unbiased fashion. According to hospital survey outcomes, adjusting for the "tendency to excuse" scale however, does not lead to substantially different results when comparing health care providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22945843     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-012-0405-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  17 in total

1.  How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies.

Authors:  J Sitzia
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Adjustment for patient characteristics in satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Phi Linh Nguyen Thi; S Briançon; F Empereur; F Guillemin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care.

Authors:  J L Hargraves; I B Wilson; A Zaslavsky; C James; J D Walker; G Rogers; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Alan M Zaslavsky; Marc N Elliott; Lawrence Zaborski; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Implementing quality management in psychiatry: from theory to practice--shifting focus from process to outcome.

Authors:  Brent M McGrath; Raymond P Tempier
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.356

7.  [The "tendency to excuse" of inpatients. The relevance of the "tendency to excuse" in the interpretation of patient surveys].

Authors:  P Steffen; O Ommen; H Pfaff
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2008-09-10

8.  An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation.

Authors:  S R Haynes; P G Lawler
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Assessment of patients' tendency to give a positive or negative rating to healthcare.

Authors:  T Agoritsas; A Lubbeke; L Schiesari; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-10

10.  Investigation of the ways in which patients' reports of their satisfaction with healthcare are constructed.

Authors:  Carol Edwards; Sophie Staniszweska; Nicola Crichton
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Importance weighting, expectation fulfilment and satisfaction: an integrative and innovative approach to measuring patient satisfaction with hospital stays.

Authors:  Christian Janssen; Oliver Ommen; Fueloep Scheibler; Markus Wirtz; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Rating Communication in GP Consultations: The Association Between Ratings Made by Patients and Trained Clinical Raters.

Authors:  Jenni Burt; Gary Abel; Natasha Elmore; Jenny Newbould; Antoinette Davey; Nadia Llanwarne; Inocencio Maramba; Charlotte Paddison; John Benson; Jonathan Silverman; Marc N Elliott; John Campbell; Martin Roland
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.929

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.