Literature DB >> 19436000

Comparison of attitudes between Generation X and Baby Boomer veterinary faculty and residents.

Lisa M Freeman1, Cathy A Trower, Rachael J B Tan, Dawn Geronimo Terkla.   

Abstract

Understanding the characteristics and preferences of the different generations in the veterinary workforce is important if we are to help optimize current and future veterinary schools and teaching hospitals. The purpose of this study was to compare the attitudes of different generations of veterinary faculty and those of faculty and house officers. A survey administered to faculty and house officers asked respondents to identify their level of agreement with a series of statements addressing work and lifestyle issues and feedback preferences. In addition, the survey included an open-ended question on non-monetary rewards for hard work. Thirty-eight of 48 faculty members (79%) and 45 of 54 house officers (83%) completed the survey. Among faculty, there were no significant differences between the Generation X and Baby Boomer subgroups or between genders. More faculty than house officers responded that delayed gratification is acceptable (p = 0.03) and that it is difficult to balance home and work life (p < 0.001). Compared to faculty, house officers preferred more frequent (p = 0.03) and critical (p = 0.02) feedback. The most common responses to the question on effective non-monetary rewards for hard work, from both faculty and house officers, were recognition and time off. No attitudinal differences were detected between generations within the faculty group, but a number of significant differences emerged between faculty and house officers. Increased awareness of the importance of balance and rewards for hard work, as well as modification of feedback styles, may be beneficial in teaching and mentoring current and future generations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19436000      PMCID: PMC2700773          DOI: 10.3138/jvme.36.1.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Educ        ISSN: 0748-321X            Impact factor:   1.027


  6 in total

1.  Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school.

Authors:  Nicole J Borges; R Stephen Manuel; Carol L Elam; Bonnie J Jones
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Generational (age) differences in nursing students' preferences for teaching methods.

Authors:  Jean T Walker; Tina Martin; Jill White; Rowena Elliott; Anne Norwood; Carl Mangum; Lisa Haynie
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.726

3.  Workforce needs for clinical specialists at colleges and schools of veterinary medicine in North America.

Authors:  John A E Hubbell; Ralph C Richardson; Lawrence E Heider
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 1.936

4.  Generation X: implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers.

Authors:  Janet Bickel; Ann J Brown
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Making academic dentistry more attractive to new teacher-scholars.

Authors:  Cathy A Trower
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  The generation and gender shifts in medicine: an exploratory survey of internal medicine physicians.

Authors:  Emily Jovic; Jean E Wallace; Jane Lemaire
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Training the Millennial learner through experiential evolutionary scaffolding: implications for clinical supervision in graduate education programs.

Authors:  Vickie L Venne; Darrell Coleman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Rapid Feedback: Assessing Pre-clinical Teaching in the Era of Online Learning.

Authors:  Daniel Walden; Meagan Rawls; Sally A Santen; Moshe Feldman; Anna Vinnikova; Alan Dow
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.