Literature DB >> 15734801

Generation X: implications for faculty recruitment and development in academic health centers.

Janet Bickel1, Ann J Brown.   

Abstract

Differences and tensions between the Baby Boom generation (born 1945-1962) and Generation X (born 1963-1981) have profound implications for the future of academic medicine. By and large, department heads and senior faculty are Boomers; today's residents and junior faculty are Generation X'ers. Looking at these issues in terms of the generations involved offers insights into a number of faculty development challenges, including inadequate and inexpert mentoring, work-life conflicts, and low faculty morale. These insights suggest strategies for strengthening academic medicine's recruitment and retention of Generation X into faculty and leadership roles. These strategies include (1) improving career and academic advising by specific attention to mentoring "across differences"--for instance, broaching the subject of formative differences in background during the initial interaction; adopting a style that incorporates information-sharing with engagement in problem solving; offering frequent, frank feedback; and refraining from comparing today to the glories of yesterday; to support such improvements, medical schools should recognize and evaluate mentoring as a core academic responsibility; (2) retaining both valued women and men in academic careers by having departments add temporal flexibility and create and legitimize less-than-full-time appointments; and (3) providing trainees and junior faculty with ready access to educational sessions designed to turn their "intellectual capital" into "academic career capital."Given the trends discussed in this article, such supports and adaptations are indicated to assure that academic health centers maintain traditions of excellence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734801     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200503000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  48 in total

1.  An elective course to promote academic pharmacy as a career.

Authors:  Patricia Baia; Aimee Strang
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Generational and gender perspectives on career flexibility: ensuring the faculty workforce of the future.

Authors:  Lydia Pleotis Howell; Laurel A Beckett; Jasmine Nettiksimmons; Amparo C Villablanca
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Career development as a long-distance hike.

Authors:  Janet Bickel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Nurturing passion in a time of academic climate change: the modern-day challenge of junior faculty development.

Authors:  Arlene B Chapman; Lisa M Guay-Woodford
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Developing physician-scientists: a perspective.

Authors:  Nancy J Brown
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2013

6.  A new model for catalyzing translational science: the early stage investigator mentored research scholar program in HIV vaccines.

Authors:  Blythe J S Adamson; Jonathan D Fuchs; Carrie J Sopher; Danna M Flood; R Paul Johnson; Barton F Haynes; James G Kublin
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  Retaining Faculty in Academic Medicine: The Impact of Career Development Programs for Women.

Authors:  Shine Chang; Page S Morahan; Diane Magrane; Deborah Helitzer; Hwa Young Lee; Sharon Newbill; Ho-Lan Peng; Michele Guindani; Gina Cardinali
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Pharmacy faculty workplace issues: findings from the 2009-2010 COD-COF Joint Task Force on Faculty Workforce.

Authors:  Shane P Desselle; Gretchen L Peirce; Brian L Crabtree; Daniel Acosta; Johnnie L Early; Donald T Kishi; Dolores Nobles-Knight; Andrew A Webster
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  The development, implementation, and assessment of an innovative faculty mentoring leadership program.

Authors:  Lawrence C Tsen; Jonathan F Borus; Carol C Nadelson; Ellen W Seely; Audrey Haas; Anne L Fuhlbrigge
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university.

Authors:  Mitchell D Feldman; Patricia A Arean; Sally J Marshall; Mark Lovett; Patricia O'Sullivan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.