Literature DB >> 19435832

Parental sex discrimination and intralocus sexual conflict.

Manus M Patten1, David Haig.   

Abstract

Intralocus sexual conflict occurs when populations segregate for alleles with opposing fitness consequences in the two sexes. This form of selection is known to be capable of maintaining genetic and fitness variation in nature, the extent of which is sensitive to the underlying genetics. We present a one-locus model of a haploid maternal effect that has sexually antagonistic consequences for offspring. The evolutionary dynamics of these maternal effects are distinct from those of haploid direct effects under sexual antagonism because the relevant genes are expressed only in females. Despite this, we find the same opportunity for sexually antagonistic polymorphism at the maternal effect locus as at a direct effect locus. Thus, sexually antagonistic maternal effects may underlie some natural genetic variation. The model we present permits alternative interpretations of how the genes are expressed and how the fitness variation is assigned, which invites a theoretical comparison to models of both imprinted genes and sex allocation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19435832      PMCID: PMC2781949          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

1.  Intragenomic conflict and the evolution of eusociality.

Authors:  D Haig
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1992-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Population genetic models of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  G P Pearce; H G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sexual conflict via maternal-effect genes in ZW species.

Authors:  Paige M Miller; Sergey Gavrilets; William R Rice
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genomic imprinting and sex allocation.

Authors:  Geoff Wild; Stuart A West
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring.

Authors:  R L Trivers; D E Willard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Sexual conflict and the alternation of haploid and diploid generations.

Authors:  David Haig; Amity Wilczek
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Tim Coulson; Ben C Sheldon; Josephine M Pemberton; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Maternal expression relaxes constraint on innovation of the anterior determinant, bicoid.

Authors:  Michael S Barker; Jeffery P Demuth; Michael J Wade
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Sexually antagonistic "zygotic drive" of the sex chromosomes.

Authors:  William R Rice; Sergey Gavrilets; Urban Friberg
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 5.917

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Sexual conflict and sex allocation.

Authors:  Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.