Literature DB >> 1582564

Population genetic models of genomic imprinting.

G P Pearce1, H G Spencer.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of genomic imprinting has recently excited much interest among experimental biologists. The population genetic consequences of imprinting, however, have remained largely unexplored. Several population genetic models are presented and the following conclusions drawn: (i) systems with genomic imprinting need not behave similarly to otherwise identical systems without imprinting; (ii) nevertheless, many of the models investigated can be shown to be formally equivalent to models without imprinting; (iii) consequently, imprinting often cannot be discovered by following allele frequency changes or examining equilibrium values; (iv) the formal equivalences fail to preserve some well known properties. For example, for populations incorporating genomic imprinting, parameter values exist that cause these populations to behave like populations without imprinting, but with heterozygote advantage, even though no such advantage is present in these imprinting populations. We call this last phenomenon "pseudoheterosis." The imprinting systems that fail to be formally equivalent to nonimprinting systems are those in which males and females are not equivalent, i.e., two-sex viability systems and sex-chromosome inactivation.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1582564      PMCID: PMC1204938     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

1.  Stable equilibrium at a sex-linked locus.

Authors:  S P MANDEL
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1959-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  On some models of fertility selection.

Authors:  M W Feldman; F B Christiansen; U Liberman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genomic imprinting: review and relevance to human diseases.

Authors:  J G Hall
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A parent's sex may affect gene expression.

Authors:  J L Marx
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Differential imprinting and expression of maternal and paternal genomes.

Authors:  D Solter
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Alternative fitness models with the same allele frequency dynamics.

Authors:  C Denniston; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Maternal inhibition of hepatitis B surface antigen gene expression in transgenic mice correlates with de novo methylation.

Authors:  M Hadchouel; H Farza; D Simon; P Tiollais; C Pourcel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Oct 1-7       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Evolutionarily [corrected] stable strategies: a review of basic theory.

Authors:  W G Hines
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Degree of methylation of transgenes is dependent on gamete of origin.

Authors:  C Sapienza; A C Peterson; J Rossant; R Balling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jul 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genomic imprinting determines methylation of parental alleles in transgenic mice.

Authors:  W Reik; A Collick; M L Norris; S C Barton; M A Surani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jul 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.

Authors:  R J Anderson; H G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The correlation between relatives on the supposition of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sex-specific meiotic drive and selection at an imprinted locus.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  On the evolutionary stability of Mendelian segregation.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Population models of genomic imprinting. II. Maternal and fertility selection.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Timothy Dorn; Thomas LoFaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Stable long-period cycling and complex dynamics in a single-locus fertility model with genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Maternal effects as the cause of parent-of-origin effects that mimic genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Reinmar Hager; James M Cheverud; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  One- and two-locus population models with differential viability between sexes: parallels between haploid parental selection and genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Alexey Yanchukov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Parental sex discrimination and intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; David Haig
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.