Literature DB >> 19067608

Genomic imprinting and sex allocation.

Geoff Wild1, Stuart A West.   

Abstract

Genomic imprinting allows maternally and paternally derived alleles to have different patterns of expression (one allele is often silent). Kin selection provides an explanation of genomic imprinting because conflicts of interest can arise between paternally and maternally inherited alleles when they have different probabilities of being present in other individuals. Our aim here is to examine the extent to which conflicts between paternally and maternally inherited alleles could arise over the allocation of resources to male and female reproduction (sex allocation), for example, conflict over the offspring sex ratio. We examine the situations in which sex allocation is influenced by competitive or cooperative interactions between relatives: local resource competition, local mate competition, and local resource enhancement. We determine solutions for diploids and haplodiploids when either the mother or the offspring controls sex allocation. Our results suggest that the greatest conflict between paternally and maternally inherited alleles and therefore the strongest selection for genomic imprinting will occur in haplodiploid species where the offspring can control sex allocation, such as the social hymenoptera and the polyembryonic parasitoid wasps. Within the social hymenoptera, we expect especially strong selection for genomic imprinting in species subject to local resource competition, such as honeybees and army ants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19067608     DOI: 10.1086/593305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

1.  Segregation distortion causes large-scale differences between male and female genomes in hybrid ants.

Authors:  Jonna Kulmuni; Bernhard Seifert; Pekka Pamilo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Parental sex discrimination and intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; David Haig
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Sexual conflict, sex allocation and the genetic system.

Authors:  David M Shuker; Anna M Moynihan; Laura Ross
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Intragenomic conflict over queen determination favours genomic imprinting in eusocial Hymenoptera.

Authors:  Shigeto Dobata; Kazuki Tsuji
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  The quantitative genetic basis of sex ratio variation in Nasonia vitripennis: a QTL study.

Authors:  B A Pannebakker; R Watt; S A Knott; S A West; D M Shuker
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 7.  Parent-of-origin effects, allele-specific expression, genomic imprinting and paternal manipulation in social insects.

Authors:  Benjamin P Oldroyd; Boris Yagound
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Gonçalo S Faria; Susana A M Varela; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The evolution of dispersal conditioned on migration status.

Authors:  Sarder Mohammed Asaduzzaman; Geoff Wild
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Genomic imprinting of Grb10: coadaptation or conflict?

Authors:  Jon F Wilkins
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.