Literature DB >> 16612891

Sexual conflict and the alternation of haploid and diploid generations.

David Haig1, Amity Wilczek.   

Abstract

Land plants possess a multicellular diploid stage (sporophyte) that begins development while attached to a multicellular haploid progenitor (gametophyte). Although the closest algal relatives of land plants lack a multicellular sporophyte, they do produce a zygote that grows while attached to the maternal gametophyte. The diploid offspring shares one haploid set of genes with the haploid mother that supplies it with resources and a paternal haploid complement that is not shared with the mother. Sexual conflict can arise within the diploid offspring because the offspring's maternal genome will be transmitted in its entirety to all other sexual and asexual offspring that the mother may produce, but the offspring's paternally derived genes may be absent from these other offspring. Thus, the selective forces favouring the evolution of genomic imprinting may have been present from the origin of modern land plants. In bryophytes, where gametophytes are long-lived and capable of multiple bouts of asexual and sexual reproduction, we predict strong sexual conflict over allocation to sporophytes. Female gametophytes of pteridophytes produce a single sporophyte and often lack means of asexual reproduction. Therefore, sexual conflict is predicted to be attenuated. Finally, we explore similarities among models of mate choice, offspring choice and segregation distortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612891      PMCID: PMC1569604          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  11 in total

1.  The closest living relatives of land plants.

Authors:  K G Karol; R M McCourt; M T Cimino; C F Delwiche
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Kinship and genomic imprinting.

Authors:  R Trivers; A Burt
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  1999

3.  Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sex-specific meiotic drive and selection at an imprinted locus.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Imprinting and seed development.

Authors:  Mary Gehring; Yeonhee Choi; Robert L Fischer
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Evolutionary conflicts of interest: are female sexual decisions different?

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive.

Authors:  D Haig; A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1991-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Gametophytes of four tropical fern genera reproducing independently of their sporophytes in the southern appalachians.

Authors:  D R Farrar
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Gestational drive and the green-bearded placenta.

Authors:  D Haig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The cost of realized sexual reproduction: assessing patterns of reproductive allocation and sporophyte abortion in a desert moss.

Authors:  L R Stark; B D Mishler; D N McLetchie
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.844

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm?

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell; T Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Endosperm gene imprinting and seed development.

Authors:  Jin Hoe Huh; Matthew J Bauer; Tzung-Fu Hsieh; Robert Fischer
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Parental sex discrimination and intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; David Haig
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sexual and parental antagonism shape genomic architecture.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The origin of the sporophyte shoot in land plants: a bryological perspective.

Authors:  Roberto Ligrone; Jeffrey G Duckett; Karen S Renzaglia
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  Amphimixis and the individual in evolving populations: does Weismann's Doctrine apply to all, most or a few organisms?

Authors:  Karl J Niklas; Ulrich Kutschera
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-03-16

7.  The effects of quantitative fecundity in the haploid stage on reproductive success and diploid fitness in the aquatic peat moss Sphagnum macrophyllum.

Authors:  M G Johnson; A J Shaw
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Filial mistletoes: the functional morphology of moss sporophytes.

Authors:  David Haig
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 9.  Sexual conflict in plants.

Authors:  N G Prasad; S Bedhomme
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.508

10.  Selection on the gametophyte: Modeling alternation of generations in plants.

Authors:  Elissa S Sorojsrisom; Benjamin C Haller; Barbara A Ambrose; Deren A R Eaton
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.