Literature DB >> 19430714

Is an estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress able to predict operative morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Daisuke Hashimoto1, Hiroshi Takamori, Yasuo Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Ikuta, Osamu Nakahara, Satoshi Furuhashi, Hiroshi Tanaka, Masayuki Watanabe, Toru Beppu, Masahiko Hirota, Hideo Baba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are below 4% in high volume centers, although morbidity rates still remain high. Therefore, it is important to clarify a predictor associated with operative morbidity after PD. The estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score has been developed for comparative audit in general surgical patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether E-PASS scoring system could predict the occurrence of complications after PD.
METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of 69 patients (42.0% pancreatic cancer, 31.9% bile duct cancer, and others) who underwent PD using the E-PASS as a predictor of morbidity. Correlations between the incidence rates of postoperative complications and the preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS) and comprehensive risk score (CRS) of the E-PASS scoring system were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 69 patients 30 (43.5%) experienced a total of 54 postoperative complications. All E-PASS scores, especially PRS and CRS were significantly higher in the patients with postoperative complications than in the patients without complication. The complication rate gradually increased as the PRS, SSS and CRS score increased. Under receiver operating characteristic analysis, if a cut-off point of CRS was 0.75, sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of operative morbidity after PD was 80.0 and 79.5%, respectively. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) did not influenced on operative morbidity after PD.
CONCLUSION: E-PASS scoring system is useful to evaluate for morbidity after PD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and IORT could be adapted without significant extra risk for surgical complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430714     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0116-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  15 in total

1.  Pancreaticodigestive anastomosis and the postoperative management strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Masaki Ohmuraya; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Predictive value of sarcopenia and visceral obesity for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy analyzed on clinically acquired CT and MRI.

Authors:  Minji Jang; Hyung Woo Park; Jimi Huh; Jong Hwa Lee; Yoong Ki Jeong; Yang Won Nah; Jisuk Park; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A comparative study on the complications of conventional and end-to-side inserting pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Norifumi Harimoto; Toru Ikegami; Hideaki Uchiyama; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Hideo Baba; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Evaluation of modified Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress in gastric carcinoma surgery.

Authors:  Yoshio Haga; Yasuo Wada; Hitoshi Takeuchi; Koji Ikejiri; Masakazu Ikenaga; Osamu Kimura
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Evaluation of estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress to predict in-hospital mortality in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Atsushi Kotera; Yoshio Haga; Junichi Kei; Minoru Okamoto; Katsuhiro Seo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) versus modified E-PASS for prediction of postoperative complications in elderly patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Kitano; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Junji Kurashige; Daisuke Kuroda; Keisuke Kosumi; Yoshifumi Baba; Yasuo Sakamoto; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Yoshio Haga; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  End-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy without stitches in the pancreatic stump.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Masahiko Hirota; Yasushi Yagi; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Use of the continuous suture technique in dunking pancreatojejunostomy without stenting.

Authors:  Tomoe Katoh; Kazuaki Kawano; Akira Furutani; Takefumi Katsuki; Masahiko Onoda; Atsunori Oga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Modified Frailty Index Predicts Morbidity and Mortality After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Harveshp Mogal; Sarah A Vermilion; Rebecca Dodson; Fang-Chi Hsu; Russell Howerton; Perry Shen; Clancy J Clark
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Modified frailty index predicts postoperative outcomes in older gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah A Vermillion; Fang-Chi Hsu; Robert D Dorrell; Perry Shen; Clancy J Clark
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.