Literature DB >> 23052750

Use of the continuous suture technique in dunking pancreatojejunostomy without stenting.

Tomoe Katoh1, Kazuaki Kawano, Akira Furutani, Takefumi Katsuki, Masahiko Onoda, Atsunori Oga.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the newly developed continuous suture technique in dunking pancreatojejunostomy without pancreatic duct stenting after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive pancreaticojejunostomies (patient age 73 ± 11, 41-88) with continuous sutures without stenting after PD were performed from 2006 to 2011. This study evaluated the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, initial postoperative day of oral feeding, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative early complications, and late complications. The indications for surgery included bile duct cancer (n = 12), pancreatic cancer (n = 11), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n = 3), cancer of the papilla (n = 3), duodenal cancer (n = 2), and others (n = 3). Portal vein or superior mesenteric vein resections and reconstructions were performed in 7 patients, and another organ was resected in 3.
RESULTS: No operative or in-hospital deaths occurred. The operation time (minutes) was 315 ± 68 and, postoperative hospital stay (days) was 27 ± 16. Pancreatic fistula, wound infection, and delayed gastric emptying were observed in 15, 15, and 9 %, respectively. Grade C pancreatic fistula was seen in 2 patients. Both recovered after laparotomy and drainage and were successfully discharged. Worsening diabetes mellitus was seen in 2 of 34 patients, and dilatation of the pancreatic duct was seen in 3 of 28 patients.
CONCLUSION: The newly developed continuous suture technique in dunking pancreatojejunostomy without stenting may therefore produce favorable results in PD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052750     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0363-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gerard V Aranha; Pamela Hodul; Eugene Golts; Daniel Oh; Jack Pickleman; Steven Creech
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Hiroshi Terasawa; Manabu Kawai; Shinomi Ina; Seiko Hirono; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Delayed gastric emptying: the state of the highest level of evidence.

Authors:  L William Traverso; Yasushi Hashimoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2008-06-06

5.  Incidence of pancreatic anastomotic failure and delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in 507 consecutive patients: use of a web-based calculator to improve homogeneity of definition.

Authors:  Yasushi Hashimoto; L William Traverso
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Development of pancreatoduodenectomy in North America.

Authors:  Thomas Schnelldorfer; Kaye Reid-Lombardo; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Pancreaticojejunostomy using duct-to-mucosa anastomosis without a stenting tube.

Authors:  Toshihide Imaizumi; Takashi Hatori; Kousuke Tobita; Akira Fukuda; Ken Takasaki; Hiroyasu Makuuchi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2006

8.  No mortality among 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in a middle-volume center.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Suzuki; Yasuhiro Fujino; Tetsuo Ajiki; Takashi Ueda; Tetsuya Sakai; Yasuki Tanioka; Yoshikazu Kuroda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Shu You Peng; Jian Wei Wang; Wan Yee Lau; Xiu Jun Cai; Yi Ping Mou; Ying Bin Liu; Jiang Tao Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pancreaticojejunostomy-a review of modern techniques.

Authors:  Marek Olakowski; Ewa Grudzińska; Sławomir Mrowiec
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.445

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.