Literature DB >> 19422571

Influence of interocular differences in the Strehl ratio on binocular summation.

José J Castro1, José R Jiménez, Enrique Hita, Carolina Ortiz.   

Abstract

The aim of this work is to determine the influence of interocular differences in retinal image quality on binocular visual performance. We measured the contrast sensitivity function (both monocular and binocular) and we computed binocular summation. Data on retinal image quality were taken from a double-pass device (OQAS, Optical Quality Analysis System; Visiometrics SL. Tarrasa, Spain), providing the Strehl ratio as a parameter to quantify retinal image quality. A total of 28 observers took part in the experiments. Binocular summation for the contrast sensitivity function was found to be significantly (p < 0.001) correlated with interocular differences in the Strehl ratio. The higher the interocular differences in the Strehl ratio, the lower the binocular summation. Binocular summation is less effective as the interocular differences in retinal image increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19422571     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

1.  Reproducibility of optical quality parameters measured at objective and subjective best focuses in a double-pass system.

Authors:  Ai-Lian Hu; Li-Ya Qiao; Ye Zhang; Xiao-Gu Cai; Lei Li; Xiu-Hua Wan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Evaluation of visual evoked potential binocular summation after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Rasoul Amini Vishteh; Ali Mirzajani; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Abolghasem Taghieh
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Binocular summation and visual function with induced anisocoria and monovision.

Authors:  José J Castro; Margarita Soler; Carolina Ortiz; José R Jiménez; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Modified monovision with spherical aberration to improve presbyopic through-focus visual performance.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Ramkumar Sabesan; Je-Sun Oh; Scott MacRae; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Comparison of binocular through-focus visual acuity with monovision and a small aperture inlay.

Authors:  Christina Schwarz; Silvestre Manzanera; Pedro M Prieto; Enrique J Fernández; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Impact on stereo-acuity of two presbyopia correction approaches: monovision and small aperture inlay.

Authors:  Enrique J Fernández; Christina Schwarz; Pedro M Prieto; Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?

Authors:  Praveen K Bandela; PremNandhini Satgunam; Prashant Garg; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Bilateral symmetry in vision and influence of ocular surgical procedures on binocular vision: A topical review.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-03-16

10.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.