Literature DB >> 31650300

Evaluation of visual evoked potential binocular summation after corneal refractive surgery.

Rasoul Amini Vishteh1, Ali Mirzajani2, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur1, Abolghasem Taghieh1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore whether visual evoked binocular summation is affected in eyes with refractive errors after refractive surgery.
METHODS: Twenty participants (6M, 14F) aged 20-35 years (mean 26.7 ± 4.4) were assessed through pattern-reversal visual evoked potential viewing with their every eye (first right eye and then left eye) and then with both eyes while wearing their best correction before undergoing surgery. Also, parameters of the P100 component of pattern-reversal visual evoked potential were evaluated after 3 months of refractive surgery in two different check sizes. Monocular and binocular amplitudes and latencies of P100 wave and binocular summation index were compared between before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Monocular visual evoked potentials elicited by two different high-contrast checkerboard-patterned stimuli were significantly reduced in P100 wave amplitude (P < 0.05) after refractive surgery. However, there was no difference between the pre- and post-refractive surgery in the mean value of monocular P100 latency (P > 0.05). Similar to monocular findings of P100 wave amplitude, on binocular viewing, the mean value of pattern-reversal visual evoked potential amplitude was significantly reduced (P < 0.05), and P100 wave latency was prolonged (P < 0.05) after refractive surgery in participants. Also, the mean postoperative binocular summation index value as compared to that in the preoperative was significantly lesser (P < 0.05) for the subject in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Refractive surgery can degrade binocular visual performance throughout the change in visual evoked potential binocular summation. However, monocular function deteriorates less than binocular function after refractive surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular summation; Refractive surgery; Visual evoked potential

Year:  2019        PMID: 31650300     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09731-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  27 in total

1.  Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing.

Authors:  E Moreno-Barriuso; J M Lloves; S Marcos; R Navarro; L Llorente; S Barbero
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Nayori Yamane; Kazunori Miyata; Tomokazu Samejima; Takahiro Hiraoka; Takahiro Kiuchi; Fumiki Okamoto; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004.

Authors:  Serge Resnikoff; Donatella Pascolini; Silvio P Mariotti; Gopal P Pokharel
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Influence of interocular differences in the Strehl ratio on binocular summation.

Authors:  José J Castro; José R Jiménez; Enrique Hita; Carolina Ortiz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Susan Vitale; Leon Ellwein; Mary Frances Cotch; Frederick L Ferris; Robert Sperduto
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08

6.  Effect of myopic excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on the electrophysiologic function of the retina and optic nerve.

Authors:  L Spadea; T Dragani; R Magni; G Rinaldi; E Balestrazzi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  The relationship between anterior corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity in conventional LASIK.

Authors:  I-Jong Wang; Yi-Chen Sun; Yuan-Chieh Lee; Yu-Chih Hou; Fung-Rong Hu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.424

8.  Binocular vs. monocular task performance.

Authors:  J E Sheedy; I L Bailey; M Buri; E Bass
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1986-10

9.  The effect of colored lenses on the visual evoked response in children with visual stress.

Authors:  Patricia M Riddell; A Wilkins; Louise Hainline
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Binocular vision impairment after refractive surgery.

Authors:  Daisy Godts; Marie-José Tassignon; Laure Gobin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.