Literature DB >> 19407288

Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.

W W Duncan1, M J W Hubble, J R Howell, S L Whitehouse, A J Timperley, G A Gie.   

Abstract

The removal of well-fixed bone cement from the femoral canal during revision of a total hip replacement (THR) can be difficult and risks the loss of excessive bone stock and perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft. Retaining the cement mantle is attractive, yet the technique of cement-in-cement revision is not widely practised. We have used this procedure at our hospital since 1989. The stems were removed to gain a better exposure for acetabular revision, to alter version or leg length, or for component incompatibility. We studied 136 hips in 134 patients and followed them up for a mean of eight years (5 to 15). A further revision was required in 35 hips (25.7%), for acetabular loosening in 26 (19.1%), sepsis in four, instability in three, femoral fracture in one and stem fracture in one. No femoral stem needed to be re-revised for aseptic loosening. A cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem is a reliable technique in the medium term. It also reduces the risk of perforation or fracture of the femoral shaft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19407288     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  16 in total

Review 1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants.

Authors:  Graeme Holt; Samantha Hook; Matthew Hubble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.

Authors:  Min Zeng; Jie Xie; Mingqing Li; Shaoru Lin; Yihe Hu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Difficulties associated with the variable geometry of different-offset Exeter long stems in cement-in-cement technique: A case report.

Authors:  Francisco Ferrero-Manzanal; Antonio Murcia-Asensio; Miguel Angel Suárez-Suárez; Raquel Lax-Pérez; Oliver Marín-Peña
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  A valuable technique for femoral stem revision in total hip replacement: The in-cement revision - A case series and technical note.

Authors:  C J McDougall; J Yu; K Calligeros; R Crawford; C R Howie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-01

5.  Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips.

Authors:  Andrew J Berg; Antonia Hoyle; Edward Yates; Aslam Chougle; Rama Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-09

6.  Femoral bone is preserved using cemented polished stems in young patients.

Authors:  Donald W Howie; Kerry Costi; Margaret A McGee; Angela Standen; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Cement-in-cement versus uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  John W Kennedy; Alex Hrycaiczuk; Nigel Y B Ng; Owen Sheerins; Sanjeev R Patil; Bryn G Jones; Andrew Stark; R M Dominic Meek
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 9.  Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Fabio Mancino; Amil Agarwal; Leonidas Roumeliotis; Alex Gu; Ioannis Gkiatas; Danilo Togninalli; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases.

Authors:  Toby W Briant-Evans; Darmaraja Veeramootoo; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Matthew J Hubble
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.