Literature DB >> 32001984

Cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter Short Revision Stem: A review of 50 consecutive hips.

Andrew J Berg1, Antonia Hoyle1, Edward Yates1, Aslam Chougle1, Rama Mohan1.   

Abstract

Revision of a well-fixed cemented femoral stem is technically challenging. The Exeter Short Revision Stem (SRS) was developed to facilitate cement-in-cement revision mitigating some of these challenges. We present the short to mid-term results of 50 cement-in-cement revisions performed with this implant. A retrospective review of all cement-in-cement revision with the Exeter SRS, at our institution, over a seven-year period between 2007 and 2014 was conducted. Records were assessed for radiological and clinical component loosening at greater than 12 months follow-up and for revision and complications at all time points. An Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for groin and thigh pain at rest and initial mobilisation were obtained. 50 implants in 46 patients were identified. Radiographic and clinical follow-up was available for 42 and 38 implants respectively at greater than 12 months. Mean radiographic follow-up was 5.1 years and clinical 4.9 years. There was no radiographic or clinical evidence of loosening. 3 revisions were performed, one for each of recurrent dislocation, infection and stem breakage. Median OHS was 39 (IQR 12) and mean NRS for groin pain at rest and initial mobilisation was 1.7 and 1.7 respectively and NRS for thigh pain at rest and initial mobilisation was 1.3 and 1.6 respectively with mean follow-up of 6.9 years. The Exeter SRS provides a viable option for cement-in-cement stem revision, with low revision, complication and loosening rates and good patient reported outcomes at short to mid-term follow up.
© 2019 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cement-in-cement; Exeter hip; Revision hip arthroplasty; Revision stem; Short stem

Year:  2019        PMID: 32001984      PMCID: PMC6985006          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  30 in total

1.  Advantages in Using Cemented Polished Tapered Stems When Performing Total Hip Arthroplasty in Very Young Patients.

Authors:  Kerry Costi; Lucian B Solomon; Margaret A McGee; Mark S Rickman; Donald W Howie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Long-term outcomes of cement in cement technique for revision endoprosthesis surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas M Bernthal; Vishal Hegde; Stephen D Zoller; Howard Y Park; Jason H Ghodasra; Daniel Johansen; Frederick Eilber; Fritz C Eilber; Chandhanarat Chandhanayingyong; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Cement-within-cement stem exchange using the collarless polished double-taper stem.

Authors:  Daniel G Mandziak; Donald W Howie; Susan D Neale; Margaret A McGee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?

Authors:  P L Li; P J Ingle; J K Dowell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-09

5.  Fractures of Corin 'Taper-Fit' CDH stems used in 'cement-in-cement' revision total hip replacement.

Authors:  T W Briant-Evans; M R Norton; E D Fern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-03

Review 6.  Cement-in-cement revision hip arthroplasty: an analysis of clinical and biomechanical literature.

Authors:  P Keeling; P J Prendergast; A B Lennon; P J Kenny
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The Exeter Universal cemented femoral component at 15 to 17 years: an update on the first 325 hips.

Authors:  N C Carrington; R J Sierra; G A Gie; M J W Hubble; A J Timperley; J R Howell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-06

8.  Revision of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.

Authors:  E J Mounsey; D H Williams; J R Howell; M J Hubble
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  First series of Exeter small stem primary total hip arthroplasty minimum 5 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Cheh Chin Tai; Hui Yin Nam; Azlina Amir Abbas; Azhar M Merican; Siew Kit Choon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Lieberman; B H Moeckel; B G Evans; E A Salvati; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of the Exeter V40 femoral stem prosthesis fracture : systematic review and single centre case series.

Authors:  Joshua W Thompson; James Corbett; Daniel Bye; Adrian Jones; Elizabeth K Tissingh; John Nolan
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.