Literature DB >> 25693882

Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.

Min Zeng1, Jie Xie, Mingqing Li, Shaoru Lin, Yihe Hu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness associated with the use of the cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.
METHODS: This study reviewed 92 revision femoral stem performed by a single senior surgeon between January 2006 and December 2012 at our institution. All patients complained of unbearable pain before operation, of which 19 cases had extensively porous-coated revision in Paprosky type I or II femoral defects and 73 had modular tapered revision in type IIIA or IIIB defects. All patients had clinical and radiographic follow-up for an average of 3.9 years (range two to seven years), with a mean age of 62.5 years (range 46-86 years) at surgery.
RESULTS: There was no re-revision for loosening. Complications included delayed wound healing in two (2.2 %) patients, dislocation in four (4.3 %), intra-operative femoral fracture in 11 (12.0 %), and periprosthetic fracture postoperatively in three (3.3 %).The average Harris hip scores (HHS) increased from 38.1 (range 20-70) pre-operatively to 82.5 (range 40-95), and the average visual analog scores (VAS) decreased from 8 .3 (range 4-10) pre-operatively to 1.5 (range 0-5) at final follow-up. Radiographic results including stress shielding, subsidence of the stems, bone ingrowth and prosthesis loosening showed that prostheses were stably fixed postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: This supported that cementless fixation, with the use of extensively porous-coated stems or modular tapered stems, was efficient in patients with a previous failed cemented stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25693882     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2696-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Preetesh D Patel; Alison K Klika; Trevor G Murray; Karim A Elsharkawy; Viktor E Krebs; Wael K Barsoum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S T Woolson; T J Delaney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

4.  Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J H Pak; W G Paprosky; W S Jablonsky; J M Lawrence
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Bone cement implantation syndrome.

Authors:  A J Donaldson; H E Thomson; N J Harper; N W Kenny
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement.

Authors:  J M Lawrence; C A Engh; G E Macalino; G R Lauro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Neil P Sheth; Charles L Nelson; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; André Stark; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Moon; Joon Soon Kang; Sang Hyup Lee; Sae Rom Jung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Marc N Thomsen; Christian Heisel; Alexander Jahnke; Jan P Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Postoperative outcomes and survival rates after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty : What can patients expect from revision surgery?]

Authors:  Manuela Hoffmann; Johannes C Reichert; Anastasia Rakow; Janosch Schoon; Georgi I Wassilew
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.

Authors:  Zi-Chuan Ding; Ting-Xian Ling; Ming-Cheng Yuan; Yong-Zhi Qin; Ping Mou; Hao-Yang Wang; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.