Literature DB >> 22528375

Femoral bone is preserved using cemented polished stems in young patients.

Donald W Howie1, Kerry Costi, Margaret A McGee, Angela Standen, Lucian B Solomon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Techniques that ensure femoral bone preservation after primary THA are important in younger patients who are likely to undergo revision surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We examined femoral stem survival, bone deficiency at revision arthroplasty, and radiographic bone loss in hips implanted with a cemented polished double-taper stem in a cohort of patients younger than 55 years.
METHODS: We reviewed 197 hips (median patient age, 47 years; range, 16-54 years) after a minimum followup of 2 years (median, 7 years; range, 2-19 years) since primary THA. Clinically, we determined survival to major and minor stem revision and cases of bone deficiency requiring a long stem or impaction bone grafting or created by the need for femoral osteotomy at revision arthroplasty. Radiographically, we assessed stem loosening, femoral osteolysis, and femoral bone deficiency.
RESULTS: Stem survival to major revision for aseptic loosening was 100% at 13 years and for any reason was 97% (95% CI, 93-100%). At revision of seven stems, a long stem was used in one hip, a total femoral replacement in one hip and impaction bone grafting in one hip. No femoral osteotomies were required. Bone was preserved in four hips by cement-within-cement stem exchange. No stems were radiographically loose. Proximal osteolysis was present in 11% of femurs. Femoral bone deficiency was graded as Paprosky Type I (97%) or II (3%) and Endo-Klinik Grade 0 (79%) or I (21%).
CONCLUSIONS: Cemented polished taper stems have high survival at 13 years in young patients and enable femoral bone preservation for subsequent revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528375      PMCID: PMC3462866          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2327-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Removal of well-fixed or porous-coated cementless stems in total hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Schmidt; M Porsch; C Sulk; J Hillekamp; T Schneider
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips.

Authors:  H D W Williams; G Browne; G A Gie; R S M Ling; A J Timperley; N A Wendover
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

3.  Formation of a synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface. Its role in bone resorption and implant loosening after total hip replacement.

Authors:  S R Goldring; M Jasty; M S Roelke; C M Rourke; F R Bringhurst; W H Harris
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1986-07

4.  Fixation, polyethylene wear, and pelvic osteolysis in primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  W J Maloney; J O Galante; M Anderson; V Goldberg; W H Harris; J Jacobs; M Kraay; P Lachiewicz; H E Rubash; S Schutzer; S T Woolson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Cement disease.

Authors:  L C Jones; D S Hungerford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Provider volume and short term complications after elective total hip replacement: an analysis of Belgian administrative data.

Authors:  Cécile Camberlin; France Vrijens; Kristel De Gauquier; Stephan Devriese; Stefaan Van De Sande
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.500

8.  Early failures of total hip replacement: effect of surgeon volume.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Jane Barrett; Nizar N Mahomed; John A Baron; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-04

9.  Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation.

Authors:  W H Harris; J C McCarthy; D A O'Neill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Revision and complication rates in 654 Exeter total hip replacements, with a maximum follow-up of 20 years.

Authors:  Jonas Franklin; Otto Robertsson; Julius Gestsson; L Stefan Lohmander; Thorvaldur Ingvarsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Still no single gold standard for using cementless femoral stems routinely in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps; John A Scanelli
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.