Literature DB >> 14650845

Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action.

Melvyn A Goodale1, David A Westwood, A David Milner.   

Abstract

There are multiple routes from vision to action that play a role in the production of visually guided reaching and grasping. What remain to be resolved, however, are the conditions under which these various routes are recruited in the generation of actions and the nature of the information they convey. We argue in this chapter that the production of real-time actions to visible targets depends on pathways that are separate from those mediating memory-driven actions. Furthermore, the transition from real-time to memory-driven control occurs as soon as the intended target is no longer visible. Real-time movements depend on pathways from the early visual areas through to relatively encapsulated visuomotor mechanisms in the dorsal stream. These dedicated visuomotor mechanisms, together with motor centers in the premotor cortex and brainstem, compute the absolute metrics of the target object and its position in the egocentric coordinates of the effector used to perform the action. Such real-time programming is essential for the production of accurate and efficient movements in a world where the location and disposition of a goal object with respect to the observer can change quickly and often unpredictably. In contrast, we argue that memory-driven actions make use of a perceptual representation of the target object generated by the ventral stream. Unlike the real-time visuomotor mechanisms, perception-based movement planning makes use of relational metrics and scene-based coordinates. Such computations make it possible, however, to plan and execute actions upon objects long after they have vanished from view.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14650845     DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(03)14409-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  52 in total

1.  Naming and grasping common objects: a priming study.

Authors:  Camelia Garofeanu; Grzegorz Króliczak; Melvyn A Goodale; G Keith Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interaction between gaze and visual and proprioceptive position judgements.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Frank Rösler; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Lack of depth constancy for grasping movements in both virtual and real environments.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Line copying: distinct "where" and "aiming" spatial bias in healthy adults.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah; Keith O Gonzalez; A M Barrett
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  The visual control of stepping operates in real time: Evidence from a pictorial illusion.

Authors:  Elizabeth M McCarville; David A Westwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The role of the cognitive activity context in the conservatism of unconscious visual sets.

Authors:  E A Kostandov; N S Kurova; E A Cheremushkin; I A Yakovenko; M L Ashkinazi
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09

10.  Differential effects of advance semantic cues on grasping, naming, and manual estimation.

Authors:  Grzegorz Króliczak; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.