Literature DB >> 18834894

Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.

V H Franz1, C Hesse, S Kollath.   

Abstract

We tested whether a delay between stimulus presentation and grasping leads to a shift from dorsal to ventral control of the movement, as suggested by the perception-action theory of Milner and Goodale (Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.). In this theory the dorsal cortical stream has a short memory, such that after a few seconds the dorsal information is decayed and the action is guided by the ventral stream. Accordingly, grasping should become responsive to certain visual illusions after a delay (because only the ventral stream is assumed to be deceived by these illusions). We used the Müller-Lyer illusion, the typical illusion in this area of research, and replicated the increase of the motor illusion after a delay. However, we found that this increase is not due to memory demands but to the availability of visual feedback during movement execution which leads to online corrections of the movement. Because such online corrections are to be expected if the movement is guided by one single representation of object size, we conclude that there is no evidence for a shift from dorsal to ventral control in delayed grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion. We also performed the first empirical test of a critique Goodale (Goodale, M.A. (2006, October 27). Visual duplicity: Action without perception in the human visual system. The XIV. Kanizsa lecture, Triest, Italy.) raised against studies finding illusion effects in grasping: Goodale argued that these studies used methods that lead to unnatural grasping which is guided by the ventral stream. Therefore, these studies might never have measured the dorsal stream, but always the ventral stream. We found clear evidence against this conjecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18834894     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

1.  Differential effects of delay upon visually and haptically guided grasping and perceptual judgments.

Authors:  Charles E Pettypiece; Jody C Culham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Distorting the visual size of the hand affects hand pre-shaping during grasping.

Authors:  Barbara F M Marino; Natale Stucchi; Elena Nava; Patrick Haggard; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Mind and movement.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Sandra Sülzenbrück
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-08

5.  Numerical magnitude affects online execution, and not planning of visuomotor control.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-01-20

6.  A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Leanna C Cruikshank; Jeremy B Caplan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Similarities between digits' movements in grasping, touching and pushing.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Juul Martin; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasping isoluminant stimuli.

Authors:  Urs Kleinholdermann; Volker H Franz; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Kerstin Stockmeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.