Literature DB >> 19398533

Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual perception of emotions by individuals with cochlear implants, hearing AIDS, and normal hearing.

Tova Most1, Chen Aviner.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the benefits of cochlear implant (CI) with regard to emotion perception of participants differing in their age of implantation, in comparison to hearing aid users and adolescents with normal hearing (NH). Emotion perception was examined by having the participants identify happiness, anger, surprise, sadness, fear, and disgust. The emotional content was placed upon the same neutral sentence. The stimuli were presented in auditory, visual, and combined auditory-visual modes. The results revealed better auditory identification by the participants with NH in comparison to all groups of participants with hearing loss (HL). No differences were found among the groups with HL in each of the 3 modes. Although auditory-visual perception was better than visual-only perception for the participants with NH, no such differentiation was found among the participants with HL. The results question the efficiency of some currently used CIs in providing the acoustic cues required to identify the speaker's emotional state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19398533     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enp007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  25 in total

1.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Audiometric Profiles in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Does Subclinical Hearing Loss Impact Communication?

Authors:  Carly Demopoulos; Jeffrey David Lewine
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.216

3.  Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Danielle J Zion; Mickael L Deroche; Brooke A Burianek; Charles J Limb; Alison P Goren; Aditya M Kulkarni; Julie A Christensen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Affective Properties of Mothers' Speech to Infants With Hearing Impairment and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Maria V Kondaurova; Tonya R Bergeson; Huiping Xu; Christine Kitamura
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Face masks affect perception of happy faces in deaf people.

Authors:  Maria Bianca Amadeo; Andrea Escelsior; Mario Amore; Gianluca Serafini; Beatriz Pereira da Silva; Monica Gori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Voice Emotion Recognition by Children With Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shauntelle A Cannon; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Simultaneous Communication and Cochlear Implants in the Classroom?

Authors:  Helen C Blom; Marc Marschark
Journal:  Deafness Educ Int       Date:  2015-09

9.  Perception of Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Emotional Speech in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Karen Chan Barrett; Monita Chatterjee; Meredith T Caldwell; Mickael L D Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Aditya M Kulkarni; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Understanding Theory of Mind in Deaf and Hearing College Students.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Lindsey Edwards; Candida Peterson; Kathryn Crowe; Dawn Walton
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2019-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.