Literature DB >> 1939571

Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

D M Citron1, M I Ostovari, A Karlsson, E J Goldstein.   

Abstract

The susceptibilities of 105 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were determined by a new method, the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and were compared with the MICs for these organisms obtained by the reference agar dilution method by using supplemented brucella and Wilkins-Chalgren agars. The E test is a plastic strip with a predefined antibiotic gradient immobilized on one side and a MIC interpretive scale printed on the other side. Strips with cefoxitin, cefotaxime, imipenem, penicillin, metronidazole, and clindamycin were used in this study. A suspension of the test strain equal to the visual turbidity of a no. 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and swabbed onto a 150-mm-diameter plate. The strips were applied in a radial fashion, and the plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions. After growth had occurred, an ellipse of inhibition was seen around each strip. At the point of intersection of the ellipse with the strip, the MIC was read from the interpretive scale. For most antibiotic-organism combinations, the ellipse was clear and the endpoint was sharp. The E-test MICs were interpreted after overnight and 48-h incubation for 58 of the strains. After overnight incubation, 87% of the E-test MICs were within 1 dilution of the agar dilution MICs, and 98% were within 2 dilutions. After 48 h of incubation, agreement was 86 and 97% respectively. E-test MICs obtained for the Bacteroides fragilis group after overnight incubation were more comparable than those obtained after 48 h of incubation to agar dilution MICs determined at 48 h for all drugs except clindamycin. On brucella agar, there was a 2% categorical discrepancy rate between the E-test MICs and agar dilution MICs, which occurred mostly with cefoxitin. The E test is easy to perform and read, is suitable for all anaerobes, can be used to test single patient isolates as needed, and offers the laboratory a reliable method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1939571      PMCID: PMC270297          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2197-2203.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  In-vitro sensitivity tests and in-vivo efficacy of cephalosporins against Bacteroides fragilis.

Authors:  I Brook
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  In vitro simulation of in vivo conditions: physical state of the culture medium.

Authors:  V Lorian
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Fastidious anaerobe agar compared with Wilkins-Chalgren agar, brain heart infusion agar, and brucella agar for susceptibility testing of Fusobacterium species.

Authors:  J S Brazier; E J Goldstein; D M Citron; M I Ostovari
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Multilaboratory evaluation of an agar diffusion disk susceptibility test for rapidly growing anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; E H Gerlach; S D Allen; J F Acar; K E Aldridge; A M Bourgault; H Grimm; G S Hall; W Heizmann
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb

5.  Effect of inoculum size and medium on activity of seven antimicrobial agents against Bacteroides fragilis strains.

Authors:  H M Wexler; D Reeves; S M Finegold
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 6.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Cell-wall-defective variants of Fusobacterium.

Authors:  C C Johnson; H M Wexler; S Becker; M Garcia; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  R Horn; A M Bourgault; F Lamothe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Antibiotic- and method-dependent variation in susceptibility testing results of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; C V Sanders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae by using the E-test.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; A W Howell; L A Maher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  45 in total

1.  Susceptibilities of Propionibacterium acnes ophthalmic isolates to moxifloxacin.

Authors:  P Dali; E R Giugliano; E M Vellozzi; M A Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of effects of medium composition and atmospheric conditions on detection of Bilophila wadsworthia beta-lactamase by cefinase and cefinase plus methods.

Authors:  P H Summanen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility testing methods: results and recommendations for improvement.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron; R J Goldman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Susceptibilities of Propionibacterium acnes ophthalmic isolates to ertapenem, meropenem, and cefepime.

Authors:  Robert Shames; Farhana Satti; Ernestine M Vellozzi; Miriam A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Review of methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobes.

Authors:  R J Zabransky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J Wüst; U Hardegger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Assessment of Etest as an alternative to agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Hsi Liu; Thomas H Taylor; Kevin Pettus; David Trees
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Spondylodiscitis due to Clostridium ramosum infection in an immunocompetent elderly patient.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Nicole Bouziges; Albert Sotto; Jean-Louis Leroux; Sylvie Michaux-Charachon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Susceptibility testing of Propionibacterium acnes comparing agar dilution with E test.

Authors:  M A Smith; P Alperstein; K France; E M Vellozzi; H D Isenberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of infected root canals associated with periapical abscesses.

Authors:  E L R Sousa; B P F A Gomes; R C Jacinto; A A Zaia; C C R Ferraz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.