Literature DB >> 3480894

Antibiotic- and method-dependent variation in susceptibility testing results of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.

K E Aldridge1, C V Sanders.   

Abstract

The susceptibilities of 36 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group to ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, clindamycin, and metronidazole were determined by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution reference method and a broth microdilution method using anaerobe, brucella, Schaedler, and brain heart infusion broths. MICs that were greater than or equal to fourfold higher or lower than those of the reference method were considered significant. Major and minor discrepancies in susceptibility interpretation (SI) were also noted. Ceftizoxime showed the greatest number of variations and SI discrepancies. In 72% of the cases, MICs in broth were greater than or equal to fourfold lower than those obtained by the reference method, resulting in 33% of the major and 22% of the minor discrepancies in SI. A total of 53% of the isolates were resistant to ceftizoxime by the reference method, but only 11 to 17% were resistant in the various broths. Significant variations in MICs of cefoxitin occurred in 19 to 22% of the isolates; 17 to 19% of the isolates showed major discrepancies and 31 to 58% showed minor discrepancies in SI. A total of 58% of the isolates were resistant to cefoxitin by the reference method, but only 19 to 28% were resistant in the various broths. Significant variations with clindamycin in broths ranged from 32 to 53% and resulted in 3 to 8% of the isolates showing major discrepancies and 33 to 44% showing minor discrepancies in SI. Metronidazole yielded significant variations in MICs in 6 to 28% of the isolates, but no major or minor SI discrepancies were noted. This study indicates that significant differences in susceptibility results, which appear to be method related, can result when isolates of the B. fragilis group are tested. Therefore, studies correlating in vitro results, determined by various methods, to clinical outcome are essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3480894      PMCID: PMC269479          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2317-2321.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Collaborative evaluation of a proposed reference dilution method of susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  V L Sutter; A L Barry; T D Wilkins; R J Zabransky
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth method.

Authors:  E J Baron; D A Bruckner
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr

3.  Collaborative evaluation of the micro-media systems anaerobe susceptibility panel: comparisons with reference methods and test reproducibility.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; J L Cotton; V L Sutter; J M Swenson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Nationwide study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States.

Authors:  F P Tally; G J Cuchural; N V Jacobus; S L Gorbach; K Aldridge; T Cleary; S M Finegold; G Hill; P Iannini; J P O'Keefe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by different methods.

Authors:  J E Rosenblatt; P R Murray; A C Sonnenwirth; J L Joyce
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Susceptibilities of members of the Bacteroides fragilis group to 11 antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  R Horn; J Lavallée; H G Robson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: myth, magic, or method?

Authors:  H M Wexler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Review of methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobes.

Authors:  R J Zabransky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  C V Sanders; K E Aldridge
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J Wüst; U Hardegger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparison of in vitro antibiograms of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates: differences in resistance rates in two institutions because of differences in susceptibility testing methodology.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; H M Wexler; C V Sanders; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Survey of Bacteroides fragilis group susceptibility patterns in Canada.

Authors:  A M Bourgault; F Lamothe; D J Hoban; M T Dalton; P C Kibsey; G Harding; J A Smith; D E Low; H Gilbert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D M Citron; M I Ostovari; A Karlsson; E J Goldstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of the inoculum effect of cefoxitin and other cephalosporins and of beta-lactamase inhibitors and their penicillin-derived components on the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron; C E Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.